Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Nowadays, there is a common concensus in the society that scandals, which are always related to bad news that we have never noticed before, can to some extent be useful. However, those kind of argument are too general that even not define which means useful or if the only reason of the scandals to be useful is the revelation of the underlying problems. As there might be some logic hided in the claim, in general I disagree with the argument.
There is no denying that in some areas, scandals can help to manage the behavior of the public people, such as the politicans and the entertainment idols. Fearing of those kind of news, they may tend to regulate their daily life, do more kind things and lead their followers to a right way. Sometimes they may suffered from scandals if they do something wrong or anti-humanitial, hence they will recognize the huge negative effect and raise the alart awareness of make wise choices as a well-know people. Just as a saying goes, if you want to be the king, you should bear the weight of the crown, shiny are always with heavy.
However, those positive influence are based on the assumptions that the media are focused on the right person that all the news that they published are real, and they will never be driven by the benefits and will always be just and even. As a result, in most conditions, not every scandals publicized were true. There are some stakeholders and the rivals, who will gain nemurous benefits if a famous person's reputation is ruined. Handling the justification to the public, a scandal can also destroy a person and push him to the evil. It is possible that they may harm the passanger they meet by accident on the road or crush into a primary school and threaten the children, which will certainly cause the disordery of the society, the panic through the residents and ever the loss of trust of the government.
Furthermore, the problems that speakers and the reformers are not pay great attention to are not always of great importance or affect the public benefits. The sex scandals for an idol, for instance, has no relation to our common life, and will not decrease our salary to even 1 dollar, however, we will criticized them on the internet through facebook or even qurralled for them at dinner time. Actually, those kind of stuff is none of our business, and the burden of the critization will solely be shouldered by the soledent one person. Those kind of revealation, is not only a waste of public source, but also can destroy an innocent intergral soul, and draw our attention from the truely significant information to the gossip.
As a result, though scandals can help to regulate the behaviors of the famous person and are to some extent useful, there are even more negative effects if the untrue scandals were prevailed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'those kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; those kinds
... can to some extent be useful. However, those kind of argument are too general that even n...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'those kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; those kinds
...and the entertainment idols. Fearing of those kind of news, they may tend to regulate thei...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...will gain nemurous benefits if a famous persons reputation is ruined. Handling the just...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'criticize'
Suggestion: criticize
...lary to even 1 dollar, however, we will criticized them on the internet through facebook o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 406, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'those kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; those kinds
...lled for them at dinner time. Actually, those kind of stuff is none of our business, and t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 539, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'Those kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; Those kinds
... shouldered by the soledent one person. Those kind of revealation, is not only a waste of ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, well, for instance, in general, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2326.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 492.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72764227642 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54881938742 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489837398374 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 735.3 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.575619739 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.823529412 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9411764706 23.4991977007 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213198429652 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583375935761 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425334595026 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101553427929 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401335110756 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.