As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Surely, the proclivity of people relying more and more on technology has been increasing, and many are concerned if this abundant usage of technology will harm human's ability to think for themselves. In my opinion, I consider technology a means of achieving something big, and that society's reliance on it does not lead to a deteriorating capacity of people's think for ourselves.
although it is convincing that some of our aptitudes of dealing with mundane tasks are becoming trivial. For example, students are now using calculators in their math classes, which allow them to skip the time-consuming and meaningless process of simple calculations. this is probably beyond imagination of someone from the 18th century, during which everyone had to dive deep in the world of just simple calculations. Or think about how people are obtaining new piece of information these days. instead of going to a liabrary and look up in the encyclopedia, most people simply take out their smart phone and google whatever that interests them. Within the aforementioned scope of technology's superceding traditional ways of deeds in a quotidian setting, it seems that the dependence on technology does hamper people ability of thinking.
However, smart technologies built in our daily lifes does not stop just on the level of specific event. taking in to consideration the instance with calculator and bring it further beyond the facial phenomenon, relying on those smart devices in our palm give way to free our mind and time in tackling things that surmount what can be done just by a calculator. Kids in school can now be taught advanced axioms and equates, because of their ability of prove them thanks to swift calculations provided by technology. Adults googling and learning their previously unfamiliar concepts can now absorb new information in a short snip and be readily prepared to learn something further developed, or will have more time to form their own critical thinking. thus the capability of thinking is enhanced by technology, instead of deprived from us.
Moreover, the fact that technology and science are created and cultivated by human beings contradicts what the statement claims. To develop technology, people need to think systemetically. And by relying more and more on the ever-changing technologies, our communities are growing an enlarging demand for new technologies. scientists in turn have to be insatiated with what they have developed and keep speculating what would be the better version of their technology driven by such demand. In other words, technology is undoubtly one of the very motivations of our activities of deliberation.
some may argue that most people other than scientists, are not motivated to think to improve technologies and thus their ability of thinking is obscured by the excessive reliance on technologies. although this may hold true if human beings are just one kind of animals, it falls apart knowing what mankind is and how we are distinguished from other specious. we are different in terms of the understanding by human being the importance of tools to reach their goals. technology is just another means of people striving to realize their goals in a modern world, and is nothing more than just an axe, which is ridiculous to conclude that it will overshine our ability of thinking.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...ty of peoples think for ourselves. although it is convincing that some of our aptit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ty of peoples think for ourselves. although it is convincing that some of our aptit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ingless process of simple calculations. this is probably beyond imagination of someo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 497, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Instead
...ng new piece of information these days. instead of going to a liabrary and look up in t...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Taking
...op just on the level of specific event. taking in to consideration the instance with c...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 751, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...me to form their own critical thinking. thus the capability of thinking is enhanced ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 751, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: thus,
...me to form their own critical thinking. thus the capability of thinking is enhanced ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 324, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Scientists
... enlarging demand for new technologies. scientists in turn have to be insatiated with what...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...of our activities of deliberation. some may argue that most people other than s...
^^^^
Line 17, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...tivities of deliberation. some may argue that most people other than scientists,...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...the excessive reliance on technologies. although this may hold true if human beings are ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 360, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... are distinguished from other specious. we are different in terms of the understan...
^^
Line 17, column 468, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Technology
...portance of tools to reach their goals. technology is just another means of people strivin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, kind of, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 90.0 58.6224719101 154% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2813.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 541.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19963031423 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99320162732 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521256931608 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 871.2 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6866895335 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.863636364 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5909090909 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31818181818 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292519810313 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862452534889 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984032407665 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195655514881 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115684640924 0.0667264976115 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.