As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
technology is the sum of techniques, processes, skills and methods employed in order to accomplish a practical problem in various fields of contemporary world. Although it is very much true that people these days rely more on technology to fulfil their daily needs, I mostly disagree with the extreme opinion that human's thinking ability will surely deteriorate when they depend more on technology for three important reasons.
To begin with, technology is helping humans in everyday life to be more productive in whatever work they do. For example, to solve a set of complex "Coupled Differential Equations" in the subject of "Structural Engineering" one prefers to run "Runge Kutta 4th order Algorithm" on his or her computer, which can do the mundane or repititive task of executing multiple iterations until it reaches the convergence point in just few seconds, that would otherwise take around hours or may be days if one tries to solve it manually. one can use this time wisely for doing other important tasks in his or her life in the meanwhile. this way, a person's ability to do multiple things at the same time became possible with the advent of technology and it doesn't imply that by making the repititive task done by a machine, humans have lost any thinking ability.
Additionally, now-a-days many people in the society are depending on their mobile phones to do their daily tasks like checking emails and sending replies to them during the travel, chatting with friends to rejuvenate their blank minds etc., While these activities have got their own caveats and downsides like they cause to deteriorate the eyesight of many people etc., this can be a challenging open problem statement for "Research and Development" Scientists and Professors. they have to use their sharp brains and this is a real test for the ability of their thought process which implies that technology has given opportunity to a sub group to think for themselves.
On the contrary, history has produced so many virtuoso like Srinivasa Ramanujan in field of Mathematics, Beethoven in field of Music etc., who were able to perform well in their areas of expertise with their own abilities much before the advent of modern techonology tools. modern age experts are no way closer to this level of talent without the support of technology, which kind of says that there are some scenarios where technology has made people somewhat lethargic and difficult to survive without depending on it.
To sum it up, it is evident from the above examples that the topic of influence of technology on people's thinking abilities is a complex study and would need profound analysis. But, an assertion which says that it surely has negative impact on people's thinking abilities is an extreme opinion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Technology
technology is the sum of techniques, processes, sk...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... order to accomplish a practical problem in various fields of contemporary world....
^^
Line 7, column 558, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...days if one tries to solve it manually. one can use this time wisely for doing othe...
^^^
Line 7, column 656, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ks in his or her life in the meanwhile. this way, a persons ability to do multiple t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 668, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... her life in the meanwhile. this way, a persons ability to do multiple things at the sa...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 776, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...le with the advent of technology and it doesnt imply that by making the repititive tas...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 53, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
..., now-a-days many people in the society are depending on their mobile phones to do their dail...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 322, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'deteriorating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: deteriorating
...n caveats and downsides like they cause to deteriorate the eyesight of many people etc., this ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 488, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...opment' Scientists and Professors. they have to use their sharp brains and this...
^^^^
Line 19, column 275, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Modern
...the advent of modern techonology tools. modern age experts are no way closer to this l...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, second, so, well, while, for example, kind of, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2379.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 460.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17173913043 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92848841955 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 752.4 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 23.0359550562 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 119.301671777 60.3974514979 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 198.25 118.986275619 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.3333333333 23.4991977007 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239639877923 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944961106652 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741789666825 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138427533863 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067070870769 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.1 14.1392134831 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 12.1743820225 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 11.2143820225 153% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.