As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
This argument that the ability for human thinking to deteriorate due to excessive assistance from technology is a rather specious argument. Its been proven through time that human beings would always have a capacity for continous mental growth as, ironically, technology has played a pivotal role in ascertaining that.
The use of technology to solve problems be it day to day problems ranging from heating our meals in microwave ovens or solving complex space travel reinstates the capability of the human mind for progressive development due to the fact that the creation of the solutions to this problem give birth to other problems of their own. Take for example the heating of our meals. The proclivity of the average human to rush over to the microwave to heat food has resulted in an increase in the number of cancer cases in regions where the microwave is used on a daily and thus we have to find solutions or cures for these diseases and to solve this problems our brightest minds have to head back to the literal drawing table to use their innate human ability to think through and solve these problems. Another example which solidifies this argument is the case that even after human beings conquered the moon during the cold war almost immediately aftre plans were made to conquer mars a feat which we are yet to accomplish and this requires scientists to think of ways to circumvent obstacles and this also requires human thiking.
Our use of tehnology to solve problems doesn't indicate in any way total reliance on it as the production of vehicles goes to show. We use a myriad of technological equipments in car production but this doesn't take away from the fact we still supervise these machines and to exarcerbate this issue there are tasks which these "all-wise robots " cannot handle and thus need human intervention. Another case is the use of calculators, a pithy example as even pre-school children interact with these cuboids of incredulous precision yet the use of the human mind is still quinessential in solving a number of problems where the calculator can only play role of assistant.
To speak of assistance is not enough as it has been observed that humans in certain aspects of life reject the use of technology and prefer to take the taditional route as is the case in the fields of sports. A notable case scenario is the proclivity for a certain group of people who decline the use of digital media for consumption of books and would rather read hard back copies than listen to computer generated voices for ebooks.
To conclude my argument is the fact that even in the use of technology the human mind is still on its toes even in the most fundamental aspects such as typing and trying to construct sentences. Children of nowadays learn to use computers before they learn to ride bicycles and that goes to show that the argument that we deteriorate our minds by relying on technology cannot stand due to the fact that in this case we use our minds to jumpp several hurdles we didn't need to overcome a coule decades ago. In a billion years technology may get to the point where no human intervention is needed or to the point where the human mind figuratively decomposes due to its exessive use but as of now our use of technology in no way qualifies our thinking abilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...r cures for these diseases and to solve this problems our brightest minds have to he...
^^^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... Our use of tehnology to solve problems doesnt indicate in any way total reliance on i...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...l equipments in car production but this doesnt take away from the fact we still superv...
^^^^^^
Line 15, column 461, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...e our minds to jumpp several hurdles we didnt need to overcome a coule decades ago. I...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, thus, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 93.0 58.6224719101 159% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2758.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 578.0 442.535393258 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77162629758 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90322654589 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65911270491 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456747404844 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 888.3 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 23.0359550562 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.0542613688 60.3974514979 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 197.0 118.986275619 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.2857142857 23.4991977007 176% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162731942227 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714783989275 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348639378143 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106223369173 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355232405609 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.7 14.1392134831 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.32 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 12.1743820225 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 11.2143820225 164% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.