As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.

Essay topics:

As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.

It is a highly debated issue whether people rely more and more on technology to solve problems and they may jeopardize their abilities to think. This topic can be approached from several angles due to its complexity. While some people tend to think that they may not be affected by technology. Others seem to disagree with it. Deeply deliberating over the issue, I believe that relying on technology to solve problems will not affect people to think, and the following discussion reveals my stand and reasoning.

To begin with, people can use technology to strengthen their abilities to think. We can use lots of auxiliary instruments and systems to help us resolve the problems, and it totally does not exacerbate our abilities of thinking. For instance, my boss gave me a mission that I need to do a presentation about the topic of Bitcoin when I was an intern before. I did not understand what is Bitcoin and I cannot ask my boss. I decided to surf the internet since I can gain basic information about Bitcoin. After I finished my search job, I started to think about how to make a precision model which can help my company to earn more money. Eventually, I did a presentation during the meeting, and my boss and other managers began to discuss the feasibility of the new idea. Thus, I think we can strengthen our abilities to think with the help of technology.

Moreover, technology is the production of human thought. When we have to resolve the problems, we will brainstorm and produce lots of new instruments or modern things. For example, people did not have a cellphone before until Antonio Meucci invented. It is too inconvenient for people that we did not have a cellphone to make a connection. Through the successive invention and production process, everyone has a cellphone nowadays. It is obvious that we still invent lots of things in recent years, and the technology did not deteriorate our abilities. Therefore, I think technology and human thought results from beneficial interaction.

True, some people might say that if we rely more and more on technology to solve problems, we will destroy our self-thinking abilities since we would not use our brains to think. However, this belief fools us to consider the fact that we still use our brains to solve lots of problems. For example, when the restaurant's manager wants to add new dishes, he has to think about what kind of food the customers may like. That is to say, people need to brainstorm in lots of certain situations. As a result, it is hard to convince people of this idea.

To sum up, with the reasons mentioned above, I think that relying on technology will not deteriorate people's abilities to think. That is not to say, of course, that other points of view are completely without merit. However, I think the reasons I provided in favor of my opinions are stronger.

Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...m several angles due to its complexity. While some people tend to think that they may...
Line 13, column 309, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'restaurants'' or 'restaurant's'?
Suggestion: restaurants'; restaurant's
...lots of problems. For example, when the restaurants manager wants to add new dishes, he has...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, i think, kind of, of course, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, that is to say

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 33.0505617978 203% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2377.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 494.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81174089069 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78182730643 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457489878543 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.0 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 23.0 6.24550561798 368% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4264705277 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8928571429 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6428571429 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.60714285714 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365348941342 0.243740707755 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928766632865 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102355098656 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218373611513 0.150359130593 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697167118014 0.0667264976115 104% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.