People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively
The author wants to convey that the people should question the rules of the authority instead of accepting them passively. Here the the authority can be referred to the government, organization, institution or society. As these bodies are governed by the elected or non-elected members and they impose the rules on the constituent members which are expected to be followed.
However this sort of hierarchical mechanism engenders to many issues that are to be addressed. First of all, if the rules set by any authority violates the basic human rights of any constituent member or members then strictly those rules must be questioned and opposed straight away. Since the main aim of any organization or institution must to be to protect the basic and fundamental rights of its members and members should see that these shouldn't be violated.
Secondly, any organization need to be accountable to its members. Accountability brings transparency into the system thereby increasing the trust of organization both inside and outside the organization. So the organization’s rules must be questioned for what is intended or expected outcome from the rule. This also brings sense of responsibility among the members which increases the goodwill of the organization.
That said, there are situations where it is best to not question the rules. In the matters of sensitive data it's better to not question instead follow the rules for the overall good of the institution. Many of the countries where dynastic rulers or dictatorial rulers have shown a lot of progress when compared to the democratic rule.
Finally, the organization is built on the fundamental of protecting and supporting it's members. For organization to progress the members should develop the sanity to question the rules of authority when they are violating the rights of the fellow members. They should also follow the trivial rules of the organization for the development of organization.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...stead of accepting them passively. Here the the authority can be referred to the govern...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...stead of accepting them passively. Here the the authority can be referred to the govern...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...s which are expected to be followed. However this sort of hierarchical mechanism eng...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
... aim of any organization or institution must to be to protect the basic and fundamental...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...mbers and members should see that these shouldnt be violated. Secondly, any organizat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lity brings transparency into the system thereby increasing the trust of organiza...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, sort of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 312.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30448717949 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12660051059 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477564102564 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4961501475 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.4375 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280972691731 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987209713858 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138351523748 0.0758088955206 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161739920838 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904162412026 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.