People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
In the present contemporary and fast paced world, important decisions sometimes might have to be taken in a slapdash and hasty manner. The author here asserts that you should resort to a risky action only after carefully considering its consequences. I strongly agree with the suggestion that the decisions to be taken should be scrutinized beforehand in order to study the impact of its consequences to check if it holds a positive outcome.
To being with, taking risky decisions without examining its repercussions can sometimes put you in a precarious situation. For instance, take the astronauts who travel above and beyond the horizon. Before actually leaving the earth’s atmosphere in a spaceship, they undergo rigorous training for around 6 to 7 years. During this period the researchers and the astronauts try to study the effects of outer space on their bodies, without conducting such studies it would be quite remiss of them to go to a place where very few humans have ever been. If these scrupulous studies are not conducted beforehand, then there is a possibility that the astronauts may come in contact with some kind of an outlandish factor which maybe be debilitating to their health or well-being and put their life’s in danger. Therefore, it is made sure that the space crew is thoroughly examined before their mission begins.
Similarly, it is important to allot some time towards contemplative thought before taking a decision even in day to day life. To illustrate consider an example of a stock investor, If the investor does not spend enough time studying the statistical data of a company before investing a large sum of money into it, there is a chance that the company might have been already failing and he was dilatory in noticing it, then it quite is likely that he might lose all the money that he has put in. However, if he had been a little considerate and taken time to look into to the company’s data to see if the company was doing well or not and then taken a decision whether to invest or not could have saved him money and this could be used elsewhere.
Nonetheless, one might argue that withholding from taking risky decisions might hinder faster and quicker progress, to some extent this might be true but the question here is at what cost? Despite taking longer a time, analysis and scrutiny into the consequences will help yield a better result. Stepping into something after taking a precipitous decision will only put you in an unknown and possibly dangerous situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 4, Rule ID: BEING_BEGIN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'begin'?
Suggestion: begin
...eck if it holds a positive outcome. To being with, taking risky decisions without ex...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 684, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'an' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...stronauts may come in contact with some kind of an outlandish factor which maybe be debili...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, look, may, nonetheless, similarly, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2097.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89953271028 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75007344728 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551401869159 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.9287115885 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.8 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5333333333 23.4991977007 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19465550201 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731646158931 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813486027778 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126241755505 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685452673129 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.