People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
People make many decisions everyday regarding both commonplace occurrences and once-in-a-lifetime opportunities. For most decisions, logic is often the deciding factor and is usually associated with good decision making, but there are scenarios that are notably emotion-based, therefore making emotion-based decision makers also justified both logically and emotionally.
Many scenarios throughout life often have outcomes dependent on the decisions made, and many people will find it useful to weigh these outcomes through logic in order to make the best decision. Many students have a myriad of activities they could participate in rather than studying, but when faced with the consequences of not doing well on an assessment or class, many students will choose to study in order to have a positive outcome. In some recent cases, though, a student's mental health may be hampered by classes and the workload involved and if mental health is a priority for a student, they may choose to face the negative consequences of not getting the best grades possible for a class in order to cater to the emotional gravity of mental health. Indeed, in such a scenario, choosing the best decision for their emotions is also a logical decision and is not a poor decision if such a decision aligns with the student's priorities.
An emotion-based or logic-based decision may also be dictated by the conditions surrounded the scenario, such as the emotions associated with jobs and careers. Some workers may be forced to work jobs they do not enjoy because of the logical benefits of earning money and benefits as well as being able to support themselves and possibly also loved ones. Other workers, however, may have access to more resources that would allow them the liberty to leave an undesirable job or career without severe financial repercussions. Indeed, many career advisers stress the importance of emotion in choosing a job or career, bolstering the argument that emotion-based decisions are not necessarily bad ones and in this case are good. The emotion tied to a disliked job in this case is considered a logical reason to leave a job, and this logical reasoning of an emotional decision is often not considered a poor decision.
Emotional and logical decision making are both beneficial in the lives of students and workers. When emotional decisions in particular are made, the logical explanations behind the associated emotions are not detrimental and are often actually beneficial in understanding a decision made.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
People make many decisions everyday regarding both commonplace occurrences ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aking emotion-based decision makers also justified both logically and emotionally...
^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
... outcome. In some recent cases, though, a students mental health may be hampered by classe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, in particular, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2123.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25495049505 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99111823656 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475247524752 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.1051422086 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.307692308 118.986275619 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0769230769 23.4991977007 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 5.21951772744 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286340457232 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131068769079 0.0831039109588 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949873832788 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209386421205 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469328542062 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 14.1392134831 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 48.8420337079 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.