People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
The author assertion is that if people make any decision based on emotion are poor decision. When people are under depression or any kind of anxiety and then make decision, therefore, they might be feel that was him/her decision is wrong. However, some decision are right.
Hence, the author assertion is right at some extent.
In human life, every human need to take decision for their future. Sometimes human situation are very hard, so, they need to take decision very quickly. In many cases quick decisions are always leads to wrong decision then, human frustrated for that situation. But, all quick decisions are not wrong, some will be beneficial for them. Hence, human always need to keen minded to take decision at every situations for their life.
Many students are feared for their exams. However, they are very hard working, also, they are prepared much for their exams. But, in some case, they feel some anxiety like what if he/she will not get good result. This type of emotions very harmful for them. Therefore, this emotions leads to bad result. Instead of wandering about their result they need to more prepare for their exams and this will definate give good results.
For instance, Apple ceo Steve Job fired from their own company as poor decision maker in 1985. But, after company constantly decrease their revenue. Therefore, in 1996, Job again recruited for ceo. In that time 100 projects are currently running and Job's stopped that projects and only work on 10 projects. Since, company launch ipad and many more successful items. In short, People always not poor decision maker.
In conclusion, if any people make any decision under emotions they will be wrong but that will not always true.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'minded taking'.
Suggestion: minded taking
... them. Hence, human always need to keen minded to take decision at every situations for their ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...tions very harmful for them. Therefore, this emotions leads to bad result. Instead o...
^^^^
Line 9, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... People always not poor decision maker. In conclusion, if any people make any de...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in short, kind of, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 58.6224719101 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 289.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98961937716 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17634130796 2.79657885939 78% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515570934256 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7021369963 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 65.5454545455 118.986275619 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.1363636364 23.4991977007 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.13636363636 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256231087646 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958246852349 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109461938142 0.0758088955206 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147653218897 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117649088483 0.0667264976115 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 14.1392134831 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 12.1743820225 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.77 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.