People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Sometimes people can be ruled by their emotions; they can affect various aspects of our life: the relationships with others, our success or failures at work, and especially those decisions we make. I proclaim that those people who involve their emotions in the process of making decisions, and who search for any logic sides in this, are not great decision makers.
People say in my country that emotions are not your best friend if one need make a decision. To make a coherent solution, one has to have a sharp mind, but emotions are what can make it opaque. Being in worse mood is the reason why one can make an illogical decision. For example, when a person is looking for solace, he can be more gullible. He can easily trust to wrong people, assuming that they want to help him. Thus, there are real cases, when such people become the victims of illegal deception.
Decisions which are made by people which are in the moment of euphoria can be also irrelevant and silly. This situation can be observed if one look at the young. The period of adolescence shows that people of this age very other are bad decision makers, because they are affected by their emotions. Also, they are seeking for logic in their actions afterwards. For example, no feeling pain and being in a good mood, a young person is ready for making dangerous actions, like stealing or driving on high speed to be respected.
Our emotions can affect our actions even when we are not the young. How often did unconfident and emotions accompanying this affect negatively the decisions which one did not make? This situation happened to me too often. How much time I found excuses because of my anxious in the possibility of fail, I try to find any logic, when I was afraid of making important decisions. I refused one company which gave me a job offer, because of this reason. Afterwards, I was looking was logic: that I was not prepared for that; I was too young for this position, although I knew that all these were my pretexts.
To sum up, I believe that emotions and the following process of justify a decision with logic is what make us bad decision makers at any age.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, thus, as to, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 384.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61458333333 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44414603213 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5234375 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2180517839 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294218950702 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918213513696 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110390861892 0.0758088955206 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212200675376 0.150359130593 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123640484388 0.0667264976115 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.