A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor

We live in a gray society where someone makes their living by principle and morals while some choose shortcuts. After the consequences of a person who commits a crime should be completely dependent upon the law but in general, I disagree with the claim for these three reasons. However, there are some serious offenses for which one should be not allowed to retain any civil rights.

Whenever someone commits a crime, he or she definitely deserves a chance to correct his mistakes. For instance, Harry brokes into the house of his best friend and steals gold from him. He not only broke his friend's trust but the act of stealing is morally wrong. He eventually gets caught and thrown into jail for the heinous act he committed. Consequently, in jail, he realizes his mistake and wants to earn money the right way. He joins a furniture-making company that uses criminals to create cheap furniture. Now, if Harry doesn't get pay for it, and jailer still uses him to build furniture, an intense feeling of discontentment will be created in his mind and he will never learn to honestly earn the money. On the other hand, if he gets paid for it, he will be satisfied and there is a good chance that he will leave the jobs of miscreants. This will not be beneficial for Harry, but also for the benefit of the society since they will be getting cheap furniture. Also, in spite of wasting time in jail, we use his time and saves public money, the Government is spending to keep Harry alive. There are several other benefits of keeping Harry busy in the Jail. Therefore, it is not immoral and actually logical to let a criminal benefit from his or her labor.

Even if we believe that as he broke the social contract, they do not deserve civil rights, then there is no way of achieving balance in the society. Punishment for the crime serves the dual purpose. Firstly, fear is necessary for the mind and secondly, the time he spends in jail for his or her wrongdoing should be aimed at to get better. For example, if a thief remains a thief even after serving 2 years of imprisonment, then we are not doing the punishment the right way. Hence, imprisonment time should be utilized as an opportunity to get corrected, and the right to benefit from his or her own labor can be a good way.

Obviously, there are several levels of crime, and the right to retain civil rights should be dependent on the severity of the crime. For instance, a murder is a very heinous crime and one should not get an easy way out of it.

The right to retain or revoke completely depends on the severity of the crime, and at last aim of every punishment should be actually get corrected.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...o create cheap furniture. Now, if Harry doesnt get pay for it, and jailer still uses h...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, honestly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in general, in spite of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2189.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 480.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56041666667 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5099100457 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49375 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9803077197 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.1739130435 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8695652174 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82608695652 5.21951772744 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264260774916 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827397191803 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787335758549 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172688491261 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488504996236 0.0667264976115 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.