The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
It is often said, people realize the value of things once they are gone. People start valuing things more, when they don't have them anymore.The prompt suggests that the real talent of a famous musician can only be judged after the musician is dead for several generations. I strongly disagree with the prompt for three reasons.
People's taste are constantly changing. The things that the previous generations liked are not "cool" anymore. They do not fit the taste of the new generation. The music choices have also changed a lot in the past few years. The kind of music liked by Gen Z is not the same as the one liked by the millenials. There are only a few people in the new generations that enjoy the classics. For instance, Kishore Kumar was a very famous singer is his time. Today, he is not listened to as much. He is still enjoyed by lots of people but not as much as before. His real talent is not recognized by the current generations because of the differing taste. This example shows us that, the music choices are ever-shifting. The real talent of a musician cannot be judged after several generations of his death as most people might not enjoy his music anymore.
Some people are naturally born with talent and some hone their skills to become the best they can be. The real talent of a person can be determined when they are alive. A musician usually becomes famous when several people enjoy his music. A musician is considered talented when his music brings peace or happiness to the people who listen to him. Several award shows are hosted based on how many people enjoy a musicians work. For example, Taylor Swift is a famous singer. She has also won many awards over the years. Her real talent is already known to people as a lot of them enjoy her music. This shows that the rela talent of a musician can be determined while they are alive and they can be honored and praised for the same. One does not have to be dead to be recognized for his talent.
A musician usually becomes famous when his talent is recognized. In most cases, a popular musicians talent is already accurately assessed. For example, recently a very famous Indian singer, KK died of a heart attack. His talents very already recognized by people and he was widely listened to by them. He had huge concerts and was awarded for his talent. This shows us that most people get famous when there talents are recognized.
In some cases however, the number of people who listen to a musicians music after they are dead increases. Suppose, an old song written by a famous musicians decades ago goes trending, a lot of people then listen to it and realize the talent of the musician. Although,this is not the case for most songs or musicians. Only a very few musicians talent is recognized in this way. A musicians real talent can be very well recognized while he is alive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...le start valuing things more, when they dont have them anymore.The prompt suggests t...
^^^^
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... more, when they dont have them anymore.The prompt suggests that the real talent of...
^^^
Line 7, column 91, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'musicians'' or 'musician's'?
Suggestion: musicians'; musician's
...is recognized. In most cases, a popular musicians talent is already accurately assessed. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 61, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'musicians'' or 'musician's'?
Suggestion: musicians'; musician's
...r, the number of people who listen to a musicians music after they are dead increases. Su...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 268, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , this
...ize the talent of the musician. Although,this is not the case for most songs or music...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 335, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'musicians'' or 'musician's'?
Suggestion: musicians'; musician's
...ost songs or musicians. Only a very few musicians talent is recognized in this way. A mus...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 379, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A musician' or simply 'musicians'?
Suggestion: A musician; Musicians
...cians talent is recognized in this way. A musicians real talent can be very well recognized...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, then, well, while, for example, for instance, kind of, in most cases, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 38.0 19.5258426966 195% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2363.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 513.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60623781676 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46747285063 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.40350877193 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 763.2 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 15.0 4.99550561798 300% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 36.0 20.2370786517 178% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8324402962 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 65.6388888889 118.986275619 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.25 23.4991977007 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27777777778 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 10.2758426966 224% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299654319213 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853089908979 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075978617851 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195385970374 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03693029134 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 14.1392134831 52% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 12.1639044944 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.38706741573 81% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.