The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
For generations, a musician's talent has been wrongly tied with their popularity. Owing to this natural yet inappropriate connection one can only accurately assess a musician's work many years later post their death so that fame doesn't interfere with one's honest judgment. Popular musicians always tend to grow more popular. It's analogous to newton's first law of motion, "An object in motion or rest, will continue to be in motion or rest unless acted upon by an external force." A popular musician's talent will always be assumed to be the best by the audience irrespective of his or her real talent. It is human to follow the norm and behave as others do in order to fit in, but not ideal.
Take, for example, Michael Jackson. He was an extremely popular musician back in the 90s who was loved by many, children and adults alike. It's been nearly a decade since his death and he is now remembered for his popularity, not his work. He is only remembered for his fame and for the songs that everyone loved once upon a time, but not because his work was a mark of great talent. This crystallizes the fact that fame does interfere with one's judgment of talent. In contrast, there are great musicians out there whose music is nectar for the human ear but they are lesser known and hence assumed to be untalented.
The talent of a musician or even an artist should only be judged based on their honest work not by how known or loved they are by the crowd. The crowd could simply be misguided by other factors or as mentioned before, a result of herd mentality. The death of a popular musician is a big hit to the music industry and the fame left behind is eventually nothing but a memory. Once fame, popularity, and herd mentality are out of the picture a musician's real talent can be assessed and brought to justice with zero influence.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'musicians'' or 'musician's'?
Suggestion: musicians'; musician's
For generations, a musicians talent has been wrongly tied with their...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a musician' or simply 'musicians'?
Suggestion: a musician; musicians
...nnection one can only accurately assess a musicians work many years later post their death ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ars later post their death so that fame doesnt interfere with ones honest judgment. Po...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 488, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s acted upon by an external force.' A popular musicians talent will always b...
^^
Line 1, column 500, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'musicians'' or 'musician's'?
Suggestion: musicians'; musician's
... by an external force.' A popular musicians talent will always be assumed to be the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... the fact that fame does interfere with ones judgment of talent. In contrast, there ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ned before, a result of herd mentality. The death of a popular musician is a big hi...
^^^
Line 5, column 440, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a musician' or simply 'musicians'?
Suggestion: a musician; musicians
...d herd mentality are out of the picture a musicians real talent can be assessed and brought...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, so, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 330.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59393939394 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50508390333 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530303030303 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8951610916 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.066666667 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13333333333 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42600485985 0.243740707755 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13095159298 0.0831039109588 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713138106966 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287268344187 0.150359130593 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468052323056 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'musicians'' or 'musician's'?
Suggestion: musicians'; musician's
For generations, a musicians talent has been wrongly tied with their...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a musician' or simply 'musicians'?
Suggestion: a musician; musicians
...nnection one can only accurately assess a musicians work many years later post their death ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ars later post their death so that fame doesnt interfere with ones honest judgment. Po...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 488, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s acted upon by an external force.' A popular musicians talent will always b...
^^
Line 1, column 500, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'musicians'' or 'musician's'?
Suggestion: musicians'; musician's
... by an external force.' A popular musicians talent will always be assumed to be the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... the fact that fame does interfere with ones judgment of talent. In contrast, there ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ned before, a result of herd mentality. The death of a popular musician is a big hi...
^^^
Line 5, column 440, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a musician' or simply 'musicians'?
Suggestion: a musician; musicians
...d herd mentality are out of the picture a musicians real talent can be assessed and brought...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, so, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 330.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59393939394 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50508390333 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530303030303 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8951610916 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.066666667 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13333333333 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42600485985 0.243740707755 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13095159298 0.0831039109588 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713138106966 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287268344187 0.150359130593 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468052323056 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.