Salaries of teachers should be affected by the academic performances of the students
The statement focuses on the salaries of teachers and asserts that it should be based on their student's academic performance. Though, the thought of the writer is positive and might somehow improve the academic performances of students, as teachers will start avoiding their carelessness as much as possible. But, more than the positive aspects, it brings out the negative results which might not be noticed in the start. The following points mentioned below are the reason why I would disagree with the statement.
Starting from the positive effects of such rule, it is not that at present teachers are not concerned about their students, but after implementation of the rule as stated by the writer, teachers will be more concerned about the students who aren't performing well. They'll provide each student the amount of time required to gain a positive result. Also, if the teachers are careless at some point while teaching, which in any way can affect the student's performances will be stopped.
But the above points are just the limited positive results as compared to the negative ones.
Firstly, it will increase the competition between the teachers about their salaries. The competition might end up by teachers forcing their students to work hard out of their limits, which might affect the student's mental health. For example, if a class of 10 students is being taught two subjects in a semester by two different teachers. Then one teacher will want the students to perform well in her subject, while the other would also not want to compromise his subject, as now the student's performances affects their salaries directly. This will increase the pressure on students and they might end up spoiling both the results.
Secondly, such law will directly affect the student, which can be in a positive or negative way. For example, there are some students who can work well under pressure, and for the increased salaries, teachers will be more concerned and sometimes might pressurize, those students who weren't doing well earlier might end up scoring good marks. On the other hand, some who cannot handle the pressure and works well at their own pace might get affected by the teacher's overly concerned study tactics and end up with a score worse than before. A class consists of diverse students with different pace and minds. The rule might be helpful for one, and might affect the other.
Thirdly, there is a possibility that teachers might be more focused on their salaries and not how the individual student is performing. And so, for higher salaries, they work with the bright students and might ignore the weak ones. This will affect the decorum of the classrooms. Furthermore, there are possibilities that some students aren't really good in academics, which makes difficult for teachers to make them score well. If a teacher is teaching the students who are well performed sportsperson, or musician but lacks academic, then no matter how good the teacher is, or how hard he is trying, his salary will decrease.
The equal salary for teachers is well balanced because it won't affect any particular teacher. Teachers won't be forced to compete with their own friends or colleagues. Hence, I would disagree with the writer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 516, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hy I would disagree with the statement. Starting from the positive effects of su...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...e more concerned about the students who arent performing well. Theyll provide each st...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: They'll
...the students who arent performing well. Theyll provide each student the amount of time...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 484, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... students performances will be stopped. But the above points are just the limite...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sults as compared to the negative ones. Firstly, it will increase the competitio...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 634, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...might end up spoiling both the results. Secondly, such law will directly affect ...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 284, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...es might pressurize, those students who werent doing well earlier might end up scoring...
^^^^^^
Line 17, column 671, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ul for one, and might affect the other. Thirdly, there is a possibility that tea...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 337, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...re are possibilities that some students arent really good in academics, which makes d...
^^^^^
Line 21, column 628, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he is trying, his salary will decrease. The equal salary for teachers is well ba...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, really, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 30.0 12.4196629213 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2727.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 538.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0687732342 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56911819353 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444237918216 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 803.7 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8060545344 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.884615385 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435209459868 0.243740707755 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132409931069 0.0831039109588 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102760896781 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226618211575 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.099769741423 0.0667264976115 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.