Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Scandals and reformers, both play their respective roles in making our society informed about the wrong doings and ultimately taking actions to reform our society based on this information. Scandals are useful, but i don not agree that they are better than any speaker or reformer, when it comes to making the public aware or starting a change in the society. In fact i don not think a comparison is justifiable.
Starting with the scandals, yes they are an important source of information on any wrongdoing in our society. We human beings love controversies and these scandals easily get our attention. All the media houses cover these scandals as much as they can to gain television rating, as they know people will watch such a news. And ultimately a scandal reaches out to mass like fire in the woods.Scandals put pressure on the government to take actions against the influential peoples, who otherwise would have not met the faith they deserve because of their wrong doings. Here we can take example of 2G scam in India. As it was a scam, a scandal, so it reached out to every citizen of the country, ultimately putting pressure on the government to sack it's minister. At the end the congress party lost the elections because of these scams 2014. Which proves that how scandals are important.
Coming to Reformers and Speaker, i think their work is not just limited to making the people aware but also showing them a path which could make the society better. A great example of it can be taken from the fight of independence for India by Mahatma Gandhi. Which influenced a lot of people to fight for freedom with him. And ultimately making the India free from the rule of Britishers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...s information. Scandals are useful, but i don not agree that they are better than...
^
Line 1, column 369, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...arting a change in the society. In fact i don not think a comparison is justifiab...
^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...ng, as they know people will watch such a news. And ultimately a scandal reaches out t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Scandals
...ches out to mass like fire in the woods.Scandals put pressure on the government to take ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 840, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... elections because of these scams 2014. Which proves that how scandals are important....
^^^^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...nt. Coming to Reformers and Speaker, i think their work is not just limited to...
^
Line 5, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...India free from the rule of Britishers.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, i think, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 295.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74915254237 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62659590207 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583050847458 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.0228307556 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171827794663 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556758118254 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04022643475 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11125541995 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.011666994999 0.0667264976115 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 100.480337079 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.