Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speakers or reformer ever could
Scandals are exclusive or covet incident caused by celebrities or politicians that come to light as a piece of interesting news. scandals are raw news that was not spoken by any speaker or reformer. But I do not reciprocate with the statement that scandals are useful to society. I am providing points to bolster my view.
Primarily, scandals are spicy news because they are untold truth and hidden stories of a person and maybe some wrongdoing. Scandals are not actually helpful and proper for society because scandal revealed a dark side of our society which may be interesting but denounce of our societies quality and may destroy a person career. for example, after the scandal of Tiger Woods, his career was almost finished and what a person doing in their personal life and peeping into their life is not proper behavior and none of our business.
Besides personal scandals sometimes ignites divisive behavior in our society. For example, if a child came across scandals about some famous people, whom he might consider as an icon. He might not understand what is hidden truth in that news. He might think that if a famous person can do something wrong, he can also do something scandalous. or maybe that incident completely break his belief. Thus a scandal leaves a negative effect on our society.
Some people argued that political scandals are helpful for society and ask proper questions which not asked by news channels. For example, 2 G scams bring the true character of politicians into the limelight. which may not be revealed by some speaker or some reformer. But not all scandals are true and sometimes presented with exaggeration.
At the epilogue of the topic, I would say that scandals are sometimes useful in some cases but completely desultory of human mental health in case of a personal incident. It is our duty to check the source of the news before take it as granted because some people life and career may depend on it and sandals are presented with extra spice to make the news interesting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Scandals
...o light as a piece of interesting news. scandals are raw news that was not spoken by any...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 328, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...uality and may destroy a person career. for example, after the scandal of Tiger Woo...
^^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Or
...g, he can also do something scandalous. or maybe that incident completely break hi...
^^
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...t incident completely break his belief. Thus a scandal leaves a negative effect on o...
^^^^
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...cter of politicians into the limelight. which may not be revealed by some speaker or ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, if, may, so, thus, for example, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 346.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84682080925 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58846131495 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485549132948 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.9640297495 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2631578947 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2105263158 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94736842105 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164980020941 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558427135996 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044343365595 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968490403722 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318978875478 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.