Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Scandals have largely become news item, not just in content, the news also read and sounds like scandals which is less on fact and more about vilification. These scandals are playing a significant role is counties politics in diverting attention from issues which affect peoples life.
Scandals have ruined lives of celebrities and politicians. The mass media have at scandals to raise their TRP ratings, as public is more drawn to scandals than serious news items like policy, corruption, etc. There is pleasure guilt when it comes to scandals which draws people into it. For example, a footballer having a mistress can draw flak on the footballer while also becoming the source of sexual fantasy to the same people who detest the player. In Indian politics corruption has entered into every sphere of governance, hardly one can claim they have not used any corrupt means. There is no sense of guilt in it when people talk about the corrupt means they have employed in their work; still it has a scandalous property in it, which the media seldom exploits.
one of the important constituent of scandal is not its content but also the form, that is, the way the media creates hype in its reporting style. Lately the media reporting style of corruption in such a way that it can become scandalous. By scandalous it is meant that it just becomes a source of humiliation and ostracization, where no rational explanation works.
The political parties have lately used such scandals and scandalous corruption charges to challenge political parties in power. The outcome such a strategy is that the opposition party are do an entire election campaign on such scandals with taking of the policy changes and issues they will address once they come to power. This has been a serious problem in recent elections around the world where the fascist parties could use their mass media propagandist to bypass all democratic processes by creating a hype around such scandalous issue.
Though as sign of hope and to fight against fascism it is often stated that such means of gaining power won’t be useful for long. As the optimists in the left, states that people's agenda or issues happening in the people backyards, ones which could not be avoided, like food security, health or job will always triumph against these fascist strategies. The elections in Brazil, India or Israel have proved otherwise where fascists used scandals to delegitimize their opponents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...t, which the media seldom exploits. one of the important constituent of scandal...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2056.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02689486553 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57355376131 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540342298289 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7122550971 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.941176471 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0588235294 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.58823529412 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163693032125 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578969900638 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0254111908296 0.0758088955206 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0950168438739 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183670105784 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.