Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Flexibility of laws are often considered to weaken the legal system. though this is an erroneous understanding, as law depends on the cultural, political and social institution. The fundamental constituent of modern legal system is rationality which paves the way for natural justice. As debated many times that their can never be a single rationale. Rationality varies in place, time and circumstances.
As we know killing human is a criminal offence in every country around the world but killing for self-defence is not. This is so because murder is considered violent while protecting oneself is averting that violence, which is just in any circumstance. Then certain cases like sexual violence, is a criminal act in any circumstance; their cannot be any be any logical reason to deny natural justice to the survivor.
Then, we have seen laws change over the period. As we see, in the present era with several women's rights movements the violence against women has received greater importance in the legal systems. There are legal clauses which protect survivors from facing humiliation and provide primary importance to their testimonials in cases of sexual violence. Such protection and dignified treatment was unimaginable in the 19th century or before. The changes in law over time is a significant to define the morals and ethics of society. This sort of changes came after years of fight on the street and in the courtroom defining the rationale of the new era.
Another significant example, in India legal system are colonial laws like UAPA or Official secrets act, which are used to scare and deter human rights activists or social workers. Under these draconian laws, the person is guilty when charged with a case thus bypass the natural justice. The autocratic laws should have been changed but the political powers and the legal experts defined their post colonial state based on these oppressive laws. Thus by not allowing to change these law, the legal system continues to be as oppressive as the British colonial state. If India has to have true independence and freedom then such laws are to change and natural justice is to be restored.
Recently, Iceland declared all religion to be "Weapon of mass destruction". Though many lauded this as a progressive move but in India such a law will mean to oppress the citizens, where practicing religion is one of the fundamental rights of India citizens. Legal system should not force its decision on the people. The work of a legal expert is complex, they cannot simply hold something significant based on scientific rationality. As rationality is defined also by the cultural, social and political ethos, thus is subjected to variations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'considered weakening'.
Suggestion: considered weakening
Flexibility of laws are often considered to weaken the legal system. though this is an err...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Though
... considered to weaken the legal system. though this is an erroneous understanding, as ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hich paves the way for natural justice. As debated many times that their can never...
^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'be any'.
Suggestion: be any
...l act in any circumstance; their cannot be any be any logical reason to deny natural justice ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 505, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me is a significant to define the morals and ethics of society. This sort of chan...
^^
Line 7, column 446, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...l state based on these oppressive laws. Thus by not allowing to change these law, th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 467, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'changing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: changing
...e oppressive laws. Thus by not allowing to change these law, the legal system continues t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 477, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this law' or 'these laws'?
Suggestion: this law; these laws
...ve laws. Thus by not allowing to change these law, the legal system continues to be as op...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, thus, while, as to, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2282.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15124153499 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84814308658 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530474040632 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 735.3 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8810272065 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0833333333 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4583333333 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102805914051 0.243740707755 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0302906815302 0.0831039109588 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0194496334759 0.0758088955206 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0600579041702 0.150359130593 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023389971389 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.