Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
To begin with, scandals are generally known for the events that cause public outrage which is illegal. According to the claim given scandals focus attention that others may not do but they are also chances of diverting the public or misleading them sometimes it may be for the benefit of the people but doing against the law is wrong. For example, Nowadays there are many strikes and other events that are against the law and becoming a disturbance for common people and another example, focusing on a group of people and making the outrage.
Firstly, scandals may focus on the things that others may not but this should be done with the law and without causing disturbance to the society. The great leader Mahatma Gandhi has done a silent rally for freedom is the best example of not letting any public disturbance or causing any violence.
Additionally, nowadays political parties are trying to make the public getting against the government with intention of letting the government down by using the public and hence they are cases where scandals necessarily do not focus on any problems.
To sum it up, scandals not always focus on problems sometimes they might be prejudicial and causing disturbance to society and making up unnecessary events.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, may, so, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 58.6224719101 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 2235.4752809 47% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 210.0 442.535393258 47% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98095238095 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 4.55969084622 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54127380704 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 215.323595506 51% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519047619048 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 704.065955056 47% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 20.2370786517 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.8391779837 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.428571429 118.986275619 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 23.4991977007 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.21951772744 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138892186859 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721040660181 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416392968716 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876731518336 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218997372383 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 100.480337079 41% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.