Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.
Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
At first glance, the conclusion says that the government should provide cities financial support in order to develop on the basis that cities contain the nation's cultural traditions but actually the nation's traditions are preserved and generated from rural areas and villages. For example, people in villages celebrate in a unique and original way of festivals.
To begin with, the claim that governments need to give financial support for the development and prosper but the reasoning is given is not related to the claim, the claim and the reason are individually true but the reasoning is inappropriate the financial support is needed for all the major cities as the population is more and development cities may increase the development of the nation.
In contrast, the nation's cultural traditions are not generated and preserved in the cities rather there are found more in rural areas and villages. For example, in India, cities have become modernized and people are busy with their lives, interaction with others became less and traditions are not much followed whereas people in rural areas are the interaction within themselves still exists and people follow all traditions and are still preserved, for example, celebrating festivals in the original traditions is found in villages only but not in cities.
To sum it up, cities need financial support from the government for the development because, for the more population and lack of facilities that are cities, it is important for nation's development but not because those cities generated and preserved the cultural traditions which are done by the villages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, may, so, still, whereas, for example, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 33.0505617978 27% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 2235.4752809 61% => OK
No of words: 259.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77932747809 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 215.323595506 52% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.436293436293 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 434.7 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 20.2370786517 30% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 23.0359550562 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 119.151747318 60.3974514979 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 228.166666667 118.986275619 192% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.1666666667 23.4991977007 184% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.3333333333 5.21951772744 275% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323823225452 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177540976041 0.0831039109588 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108093534877 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224665099775 0.150359130593 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582529968643 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.1 14.1392134831 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.37 48.8420337079 40% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 21.2 12.1743820225 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.29 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 100.480337079 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 11.2143820225 171% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.