Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Media has been developed and communication has been enhanced to pass information and to create awareness among people, however there are certain news with in a political body or organization which remains intact and never comes to public light. Country which holds democracy, information should reach the public circle. Nowadays scandals have been circulated all over the media pass on information among public. Even though this seems to be a problem solver for people, rumours and hoax has ruined the legitimacy of the information.
Primary notion of the scandals which is currently passed on should awake the public from their prejudice and give them an objective analysis. For example, 2G spectrum scandal which never came to light until 4 years of it's scam. Citizens were oblivious about a huge scam which costed billion of dollars for the nation and caused a huge lose to the country. When the scandal released to the public front, people started questioning the affair. Such circumstances, where a scandal makes a good notice to people. Make constitution act in a proper way for its own right.
While the scandals which tends to create sensation and popularity among the public and gives them no useful news other than an initial excitement is a serious problem. Media and internet forwards myriad of information, which flows in and around our social sites and timeline. We see numerous scandals as videos, pictures, and articles. News agencies which tries to increase its popularity create certain ineffectual news and publish to the public surroundings. Eventually public lose interest in the news and never notice or believe the scandals, even when they are legitimate.
Genuine News publishers who has marked their name along public behaves differently. Even though people are bored about scandals or think they are rumours, we used to follow certain publishers who post authenticated information and bring public notice. For example, I have subscribed to very few newsletters and flash news update with the "The Hindu", Economic Times and Scientific American. I believe the information they have passed has been well processed and confirmed before they publish. Following these informations really gives a better picture about the society.
To conclude, Information is a right to human being, but exploiting the social media and internet by spreading rumours should be condemnable. As I stated earlier publishers who publish veritable informations or the information which gives a valid evidence of the cause, should be known to a common man. This in many ways gives a better knowledge to solve the issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...blivious about a huge scam which costed billion of dollars for the nation and caused a ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...notice to people. Make constitution act in a proper way for its own right. While the scandal...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'really', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'while', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.255913978495 0.240241500013 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.169892473118 0.157235817809 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0989247311828 0.0880659088768 112% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0279569892473 0.0497285424764 56% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0365591397849 0.0444667217837 82% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0838709677419 0.12292977631 68% => OK
Participles: 0.0494623655914 0.0406280797675 122% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.7739178397 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0365591397849 0.030933414821 118% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.094623655914 0.0997080785238 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00860215053763 0.0249443105267 34% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0322580645161 0.0148568991511 217% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2635.0 2732.02544248 96% => OK
No of words: 420.0 452.878318584 93% => OK
Chars per words: 6.27380952381 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.407142857143 0.366273622748 111% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.283333333333 0.280924506359 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.202380952381 0.200843997647 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.140476190476 0.132149295362 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7739178397 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 219.290929204 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.48968727796 111% => OK
Word variations: 62.6935811472 55.4138127331 113% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.2608695652 23.380412469 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3498720756 59.4972553346 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.565217391 141.124799967 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2608695652 23.380412469 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.391304347826 0.674092028746 58% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 46.5942028986 51.4728631049 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.66055045872 1.64882698954 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306141001731 0.391690518653 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0755603905702 0.123202303941 61% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0484559665754 0.077325440228 63% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.485477379951 0.547984918172 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.135529786661 0.149214159877 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108495075275 0.161403998019 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542203017895 0.0892212321368 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.33195805582 0.385218514788 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0467322975117 0.0692045440612 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208003691575 0.275328986314 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391032188314 0.0653680567796 60% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.30420353982 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 9.0 3.66592920354 246% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.