An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be paid subsidies for farming the new variety of millet. Since millet is already a staple food in Tagus, people will readily adopt the new variety. To combat vitamin A deficiency, the government of Tagus should do everything it can to promote this new type of millet.
Impoverished people of Tagus are suffering from the vitamin A deficiency, so the International Development Organisation, trying to mitigate the issues by providing high qualities millets which is a new breed. This engineered millet is rich in Vitamin A, so the International Development Organisation believes that this would serve as panacea for the problems there in Tagus. Since it is an impoverished nation farmers were also given subsidies for the millets production, so this might be helpful for the people for Tagus to fight with the Vitamin Deficiency problem. But there certain factors to be considered before implementing this method in Tagus.
Various factors of Vitamin A deficiency problems could be their current intake of food, not aware about the nutritions, wrong agricultural practices, so the welfare organisation should have looked in to the current food components being consumed by the Tagus people. And also being said that they consume millets highly, organisation and the government should look for the current millet agricultural methods and try to endorse the benefits of good practices which would naturally enhance the nutritions of the millets.
Farmers of Tagus and their cropping methods might not be suited for the current changes of climates. So Government has to take the responsibility in reaching out to farmers and make them understand about the problems and involve them in new cropping and efficient agricultural methods. Another point to consider, even though millets are rich in Vitamin A and well tested, since these millets are engineered, Tagus people might be frightened about the caustics. So the awareness about the millets and its richness in Vitamin A should be informed to the people of Tagus.
In conclusion, the steps which has been taken by International Development Organisation is appreciable and the schemes provided by the government to lend subsidies to the farmers, may help them in fighting Vitamin A deficiency. But the certain factors which I mentioned has to be considered, because even if new millets are brought into picture with a bad agricultural practice they cannot provide the desired result the International Board expecting. Awareness programmes about nutrition benefits should be given to the people of Tagus before implementing this solution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 453, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'millets'' or 'millet's'?
Suggestion: millets'; millet's
...rmers were also given subsidies for the millets production, so this might be helpful fo...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'well', 'as to', 'in conclusion', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.281329923274 0.25644967241 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.168797953964 0.15541462614 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.074168797954 0.0836205057962 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0281329923274 0.0520304965353 54% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0255754475703 0.0272364105082 94% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135549872123 0.125424944231 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0639386189258 0.0416121511921 154% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.01376403219 2.79052419416 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0332480818414 0.026700313972 125% => OK
Particles: 0.00255754475703 0.001811407834 141% => OK
Determiners: 0.107416879795 0.113004496875 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0306905370844 0.0255425247493 120% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0102301790281 0.0127820249294 80% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2323.0 2731.13054187 85% => OK
No of words: 363.0 446.07635468 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.39944903581 6.12365571057 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.57801047555 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.421487603306 0.378187486979 111% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.347107438017 0.287650121315 121% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.217630853994 0.208842608468 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.162534435262 0.135150697306 120% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01376403219 2.79052419416 108% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 207.018472906 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468319559229 0.469332199767 100% => OK
Word variations: 48.6876210539 52.1807786196 93% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.039408867 65% => OK
Sentence length: 27.9230769231 23.2022227129 120% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1044926159 57.7814097925 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.692307692 141.986410481 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9230769231 23.2022227129 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.769230769231 0.724660767414 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.58251231527 28% => OK
Readability: 62.6338207247 51.9672348444 121% => OK
Elegance: 2.16091954023 1.8405768891 117% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422306582194 0.441005458295 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.184189160804 0.135418324435 136% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0777052804216 0.0829849096947 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.642338263716 0.58762219726 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.13172022398 0.147661913831 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207594342361 0.193483328276 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589763337581 0.0970749176394 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.483146979942 0.42659136922 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0458327366302 0.0774707102158 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317869420948 0.312017818177 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764954385079 0.0698173142475 110% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.33743842365 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.87684729064 58% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.82512315271 21% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 6.46551724138 108% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 5.36822660099 75% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 14.657635468 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.