All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary
World is developing with a wide range of companies along with the global economy. As the companies increase and time runs there is always a necessary for the company to be lucrative and flourish in the market. So a profitable business always requires some expertise of looking into the markets trends and coming up with an approach which looks plausible for the business. Such important decisions are taken on the basis of an expert consultant who is hired from outside or from the employees of the companies, itself raises a strong question, whether the company is demanding to grow globally in a competitive market or its underplaying in a small market alongside with its peers. Still the scenario speaks more about the consultants(considered to be an expert in the relative field) lets take global companies as an example.
Firstly, I would like to take companies which are looking for a much broader and firmer ways of development in the wide market. Such firms tends to approach the expertise help in order to gain profound market knowledge and insightful strategies. Because a consultant who is consummate in his/her respective field knows the bounds of the market and they can predict the growth with the knowledge they possess. In my experience, since I am from a global company which has similar scenario, we used to hire experts in the same field to analyse the results better. This approach always provided a upper hand for us in the business.
Secondly, if a company looks for the employees views and suggestions, which is appreciable from the employer side, but the results are bound to company. Since the employees who are part of the company is well known about the firm's infrastructure and its competitors, there are always a chance they might overlook the market and the results are more biased in terms of their knowledge which exhibited inside the company alone. Certain companies which holds a huge market share with giant peers competing anytime to overcome its shares, might be vulnerable with the above approach.
Additionally, the consultants who have the field relative expertise should be trustworthy and reliable in order to conceal the companies strategies. Since the consultants are more common in the field, other competitive companies tend to pull the company to gain the knowledge of it competitors. There are certain vulnerabilities to this approach in term breach of trust. Still this approach is considered to effective since the companies tend to hold an agreement with the consultant and go with the legal lawsuits and proceeding to ensure the level of faith between the consultant and the company.
To conclude, I would like to put forth that companies should get an expert consultant in the field. Because top companies which have developed in E-commerce(Amazon), Textiles(Raymond, Levi's), Groceries(Walmart, BigBasket) have always got help from the market consultants and experts. So its an added values to the company to become more profitable in their field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 492, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hired from outside or from the employees of the companies, itself raises a strong...
^^
Line 1, column 622, Rule ID: IT_IS[7]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...row globally in a competitive market or its underplaying in a small market alongsid...
^^^
Line 1, column 683, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
... small market alongside with its peers. Still the scenario speaks more about the cons...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'tend'.
Suggestion: tend
...elopment in the wide market. Such firms tends to approach the expertise help in order...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'consummated'.
Suggestion: consummated
...strategies. Because a consultant who is consummate in his/her respective field knows the b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s better. This approach always provided a upper hand for us in the business. S...
^
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'firms'' or 'firm's'?
Suggestion: firms'; firm's
... of the company is well known about the firms infrastructure and its competitors, the...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 372, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
... this approach in term breach of trust. Still this approach is considered to effectiv...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 295, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'value'?
Suggestion: value
...onsultants and experts. So its an added values to the company to become more profitabl...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'well']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.251893939394 0.240241500013 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.142045454545 0.157235817809 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0890151515152 0.0880659088768 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.032196969697 0.0497285424764 65% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0359848484848 0.0444667217837 81% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123106060606 0.12292977631 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0284090909091 0.0406280797675 70% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.97964384204 2.79330140395 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0397727272727 0.030933414821 129% => OK
Particles: 0.00378787878788 0.0016655270985 227% => OK
Determiners: 0.136363636364 0.0997080785238 137% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0132575757576 0.0249443105267 53% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0208333333333 0.0148568991511 140% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3003.0 2732.02544248 110% => OK
No of words: 491.0 452.878318584 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.11608961303 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.368635437882 0.366273622748 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.279022403259 0.280924506359 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.211812627291 0.200843997647 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.156822810591 0.132149295362 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97964384204 2.79330140395 107% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 219.290929204 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454175152749 0.48968727796 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.6835658099 55.4138127331 93% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.55 23.380412469 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8715040064 59.4972553346 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.15 141.124799967 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.55 23.380412469 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.674092028746 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.21349557522 173% => OK
Readability: 52.4522403259 51.4728631049 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.91891891892 1.64882698954 116% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324097416214 0.391690518653 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.113297966705 0.123202303941 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0639771546869 0.077325440228 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.599796143399 0.547984918172 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.136062104849 0.149214159877 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158222690356 0.161403998019 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786000724046 0.0892212321368 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.541929752415 0.385218514788 141% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0461625801656 0.0692045440612 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252235946241 0.275328986314 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455264192258 0.0653680567796 70% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 7.22455752212 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.