Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
The speaker asserts that college students should choose their field of study according to their talents and others believe that they should prioritize the availability of jobs in a specific field. I mostly agree with the first opinion for some reasons.
Firstly, the reason for my viewpoint is people can excel in a subject that attracts them more. An example can be helpful to illustrate the idea. If someone like medical science and is passionate about it, he can excel in the subject more than anyone else. If he is forced to do engineering, thinking that it has more job opportunities than medical science, he would not be able to perform well in his academic career. Gradually he will become demotivated about his future. Because no field of study is easy to learn. Almost all of them need enough attention and hard work. It will eventually become impossible for a demotivated student to get a good job in the highly competitive world. Because without skills, no one can achieve the desired success.
Secondly, another reason for my viewpoint lies in the fact that job market is shifting regularly. If a person is choosing a subject that is very demanding in the job market right now, it is not necessary that things will be the same after his graduation from that particular subject. The situation may reverse totally. In today's world machine is taking the workers' responsibility. So the works done by men previously have been replaced by automation. So the demand of labourous work is decreasing day by day. So relying solely on the job market before choosing a subject can be detrimental for a student.
Though these two reasons give ample room to support the viewpoint, in some cases the opposite can be proven true. If someone is from an underdeveloped country where the deamnd of a specific subject has no future, it would not be wise to choose that subject. Because no matter how much skills he acquire, he would not get enough opportunities to show his talent. So in some cases people should also think about the job market before choosing their desired subject. Otherwise it can be detrimental for their future.
To sum up, it can be said that people should be skilled enough to get a job even in a less popular job field by their hard work. But if someone has financial binding, who can not take any risk, should be aware of the job market also.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 474, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ll become demotivated about his future. Because no field of study is easy to learn. Alm...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
.... In todays world machine is taking the workers responsibility. So the works done by me...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...abourous work is decreasing day by day. So relying solely on the job market before...
^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ose that subject. Because no matter how much skills he acquire, he would not get eno...
^^^^
Line 7, column 296, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'acquires'.
Suggestion: acquires
...t. Because no matter how much skills he acquire, he would not get enough opportunities ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 465, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
... before choosing their desired subject. Otherwise it can be detrimental for their future....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 229, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...risk, should be aware of the job market also.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, in some cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 413.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75060532688 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6026386484 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510895883777 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3003648945 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.48 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.52 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238937198442 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650510916492 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128773052345 0.0758088955206 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188132330836 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.184001327596 0.0667264976115 276% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 14.1392134831 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.