Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the wellbeing
of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that
the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to
make as much money as possible.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own
position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
In the present day, we live in a democratic society where everyone has their own right and everyone has their own duty to make their society better. In order to ensure the progress of our society corporation plays an imperative role. The above prompt sets out that though some people believe that corporations should focus on making a profit within the law others believe that corporations should promote the well-being of society. While I concede that corporations should focus on their lucratively, in my opinion, I mostly agree with the people's belief that corporations have the responsibility to promote the well-being of society and the environment.
To begin with, corporations should promote the moral uprightness of the people in the society in which they act. They should promote the moral deification of the people to ensure a society's progress. For example, corporate should encourage people to protect their environment in order to curb pollution. They should launch campaigns to educate people about the catastrophic nature of pollution. The above example shows that corporations have the ability to educate an entire population of a society. If people in a society are aware of pollution then, a corporation has a better chance of being effective in the future. In other words, if the corporation takes responsibility for society's well-being they fortify its chances of being lucrative in the near future.
Furthermore, a corporation can enhance its profitability by gaining people’s trust. Sometimes a corporation’s lucratively depends on the people of the society in one way or another. Let’s take an example if a corporation takes the responsibility of promulgating the value of education in society it will be profitable in the near future. The more a society’s people will get educated the more they will get reasonable to understand a corporation's goals and ethics. Moreover, if a corporation helps to propagate education in a society then it will have a better chance that today’s students may help the corporation to be lucrative in the future.
However, sometimes a corporation’s main goal should be to make as much money as possible. A corporation should focus on their remuneratively in order to progress in the future. For example, a corporation mainly produces and distributes medicine to fund its research on medical experiments. Then a corporation should focus on its higher goal of curing decease. The above example shows that not all corporations should take the responsibility to promote the well-being of society rather than it should focus on their main goal, otherwise, their greater purposes will be hampered and society will suffer the consequences.
Despite these reasons focusing only on being profitable has its merit in that sometimes it will serve the better goals such as inventing technologies, curing diseases, etc but the advantages of only being profitable are overshadowed by the possible disadvantages which are far more severe in nature. Therefore, only being lucrative is not advisable but focusing on improving a society’s moral uprightness and environment which can sustain the lucrative of a corporation is preferable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 541, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... in my opinion, I mostly agree with the peoples belief that corporations have the respo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, such as, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2695.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 504.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34722222222 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17756248478 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.414682539683 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 879.3 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5991969091 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.173913043 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9130434783 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.34782608696 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336240130221 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121624724115 0.0831039109588 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064952680298 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210292439546 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828422931065 0.0667264976115 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.