Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the wellbeing of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The two different opinions both have their reasons, but I think I better fit with the idea that corporations should be interested in preserving the environment and society.
First of all, this operation may make people more conscious of many problems that we live as mankind. For example, if a corporation stands against any form of racism and bullying, the geneal consumer will start to think how actually his actions can be detrimental for the people he encounters every day, even if he wouldn’t describe himself as a racist or a bully. This would greatly improve the society in which we live.
Speaking of improvement, we must be concerned about the environmental crisis that we’re facing in this era. The industries keep increasing their productions without thinking that our planet isn’t able to sustain them, and their inquination. If companies start to show how important is to preserve our world, people may decide to change their behaviour, thus changing even the market and avoiding a cataclysm. For example if everybody decides to prefer to buy bio products rather than the more difficult to destroy ones, we could lessen the amount of trash that we can’t get rid of.
Actually some companies could even see their incomes increase. If the public is convinced to spend their money on more echologic items, then the companies that invest so much on publicing that will eventually make much more money, squelching the concorrence. For example in the last few years, there has been a scandal regarding the palm oil. In fact, cultivating it was very noxious for the Earth, and many companies decided to go against the use of such oil, and in their ads they would underscore that they don’t have any palm oil in their products. The consumers (some even thought that such oil was dangerous for their own health) started to prefer those products and the cited companies got insanely richer from this marketing expedience.
Of course, there are some reasons for thinking that a company should think more on making money. First of all such companies help making the economy more active. This means that products and capitals aren’t stactionary but move along the globe. Such activity permits people to enrich and lowers the percentage of powerty, and almost everyone gets richer: someone more, someone less.
Another consideration is that if a company has more money, it could invest that money in innovative means of production. In the last decades there has been an increasing interest towards renewable energy, but many companies simply cannot afford them, since they haven’t been much developed before and therefore are still quite expensive. For example the solar panels are very good and advanced, and permit the owners to get energy almost for free once installed. The problem is that their initial cost is very high and it’s difficult for many societies to invest in them. But if a company enriches itself, then it could afford them and if these kinds of products began to be used largely we could diminish the global pollution.
In the end it has been seen that there are indeed some reasons to think that it’s good for companies to focus on making money, but there are even more important reasons to make sure that there’s good publicity and interest toward the social and environmental improvements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...If companies start to show how important is to preserve our world, people may dec...
^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to make' or 'make'.
Suggestion: to make; make
...money. First of all such companies help making the economy more active. This means tha...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, may, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, thus, for example, i think, in fact, of course, speaking of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 33.0505617978 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2812.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 556.0 442.535393258 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05755395683 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85588840946 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6360182483 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517985611511 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 871.2 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5843743224 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.260869565 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1739130435 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21739130435 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0840905879562 0.243740707755 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0279018757561 0.0831039109588 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273262265259 0.0758088955206 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0497245453652 0.150359130593 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237042942286 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 100.480337079 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.