Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Indeed, the technology provides all the luxuries of our life but the arts pacifies our aching body and soul from the hustle bustle of the daily life. Art can be described as a sabbatical, responsible for rejuvination of the tired mind and body. Art has always played a pivotal role and the evidence can be seen in the various museums around the world, literary works of personalities like Shakespeare, Rabindranath Tagore and, even in the exacavation in cities like Mohanjodaro and Hadappa.
Perception, helps us to see the world in different manner from others. Some view that goverment should provide funding to the art so that it can be available to the mass, while others fear it. Government plays a vital role in changing the lifestyle of the people. Some countries like Vietnam has rich culture of art and it is necessary for the government to present the art to the world as well as preserve it. Establishments of various museums portraying the masterpieces of eminent art personalities, funding various dance academies to maintain the legacy of the dance culture of the nation, and also providing consideration to the marvellous literary works like Geetanjali by Rabindranath Tagore is of prime importance. Their is a definite need to make this marvellous work of artistic talents to reach the mob. These will not only be able to soothe out the minds of several but also inspires the youth to work in same direction. It also gives ensurity to the youth that their work, if worth, will also be respected by the world.
Perhaps, whenever a government is involved in such disciplines, the danger to the integrity is always a matter of concern. Similarly, aesthetics are concerned that funding of art can prove to be noxious for the art world. Their fear can be very well sensed from the prevalence of jealousy among various artists, after some being greatly favored, can bring out disastrous results. The cases involving forgeries, stealing of concept and ideology of various noble personalities is not novel. History is filthed with such cases, time when accessing such things was not facile as compared to present, where everything is becoming a cake walk. Various cases have been cropped up where artists debate with each other claiming the noteworthy pieces to them.
Government should definitely fund the art so that it can reach the mob and its lovers can enjoy them fullest but also should be careful while promoting the work of artists. They should completely analyse the authenticity of the work before supporting them immensely. Government should be as fair as possible, focusing only on the promotion of the genuine marvellous pieces, not the sign of the renowned artists, cutting a piece of cake because of undersignature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 724, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: There
...ndranath Tagore is of prime importance. Their is a definite need to make this marvell...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Similarly, aesthetics are concerned that funding of art can prove to be noxious f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, then, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2328.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 457.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09409190372 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82104675678 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5295404814 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 724.5 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0585049756 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.4 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.85 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298410067441 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089834658872 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886721597293 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179074622456 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337762205791 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.