Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Many experts believe that the government should support the arts to make the arts flourish and ensure all people to enjoy. however, others are against this view because government funding can harm the integrity of the arts. I believe that the government should not fund the arts because the arts can be used according to the government’s purpose such as propaganda.
Admittedly, government funding in the arts can have advantageous effects on the arts and society in some cases. For example, the British government made arts council England and ensured that this institution supports art education to encourage people to enjoy the arts, especially opera. arts council England made “opera Squad” and helped connecting pupils and staff to professionals working in the industry by supporting. In addition, they supported teachers to explore opera as a stimulus for learning across the curriculum. As a result, students can improve their curiosity about the arts and teachers can supply high-quality educational material for students by patronizing the arts. Besides, it could encourage their parents to get interested in opera. therefore, the funding from government can improve awareness and interest in the arts.
However, despite its benefits, there is a strong reason to believe that government should suspend funding for the arts because it has a detrimental impact on the arts because the arts can be used as powerful propaganda tools for communism. For example, the former Soviet Union government provided funding to Russia arts in the past and they asked the artists to produce some art forms to advertise the government's spirit. that is why for the artists in Russia at the time there was no choice to draw paintings that praise their governments and they were not free to do their own art to get financial support from the government. therefore, nations prevent government funding for the arts.
Since government funding has an adverse effect on the arts, society’s help would reap more benefits. For example, during the renaissance period, the Medici family patronized many artists like Da Vinci, when these artists were young and not famous. If Medici family had not supported the artists, the renaissance period would have not been able to thrive. therefore, the artists can ask individual sponsors for help.
In conclusion, although it is important for government to patronize the arts and artists, funding from government to the arts may threaten the pure spirit of the arts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Many experts believe that the government...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...lourish and ensure all people to enjoy. however, others are against this view because g...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt's purpose such as propaganda. Admittedly, government funding in the ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Arts
...le to enjoy the arts, especially opera. arts council England made 'opera Squad&...
^^^^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to connect' or 'connect'.
Suggestion: to connect; connect
...made 'opera Squad' and helped connecting pupils and staff to professionals worki...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 782, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...eir parents to get interested in opera. therefore, the funding from government can improv...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e awareness and interest in the arts. However, despite its benefits, there is ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...ms to advertise the governments spirit. that is why for the artists in Russia at the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 641, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... financial support from the government. therefore, nations prevent government funding for...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vent government funding for the arts. Since government funding has an adverse ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 371, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...iod would have not been able to thrive. therefore, the artists can ask individual sponsor...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can ask individual sponsors for help. In conclusion, although it is important ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2116.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 400.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81645166832 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1779365831 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.368421053 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0526315789 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21052631579 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.521924854873 0.243740707755 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187634406957 0.0831039109588 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14904353848 0.0758088955206 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.342373351486 0.150359130593 228% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.17124420413 0.0667264976115 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.