Some people claim that a nation's government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state. Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Some experts believe that the government should preserve its nature and wilderness area in their country. However, others are against this issue because they claim that these areas should be used for economic development. I believe that wilderness areas should be protected in many countries because they have a positive impact on countries.
Admittedly, it may be clear that deforestation gives a few benefits to society. this is because people can gain economic advantages by doing that. For example, people who are mired in poverty can participate in deforestation activity to earn money. As a result, those who cannot afford their lives would yield profit by working in the timber industry. moreover, people can have more space to construct buildings for public use such as offices and factories as well as housing. Thus, lots of companies can produce clothing and essential items and sell those to customers. therefore, it may be evident that deforestation has positive effects on countries and society.
On the other hand, there is a strong reason to believe that wilderness areas should be protected from the government. this is due to the fact that forests reduce carbon dioxide in the air. In particular, trees play an indispensable role in sucking carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. moreover, they digest carbon dioxide and create oxygen and release it through the air. therefore, the government should preserve its wilderness areas for humans’ health and nature itself.
In addition, by preserving nature, many nations can get scientific development. For example, Lewis and Clark’s expedition was the first transcontinental expedition to the Pacific Coast by the United States. they could study the area’s plants, animal life and geography. And also, they discovered how the region could be exploited economically. As a result, by preserving nature, people can improve scientific achievement. therefore, it is vital that government should protect its nature.
In conclusion, I think the government should preserve its wilderness areas because of scientific improvement and the decline of carbon dioxide despite its benefit such as job opportunities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve a positive impact on countries. Admittedly, it may be clear that defores...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...tation gives a few benefits to society. this is because people can gain economic adv...
^^^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...ofit by working in the timber industry. moreover, people can have more space to construc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 582, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...tial items and sell those to customers. therefore, it may be evident that deforestation h...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... effects on countries and society. On the other hand, there is a strong rea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 127, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...hould be protected from the government. this is due to the fact that forests reduce ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 293, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...ing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. moreover, they digest carbon dioxide and create ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 380, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... oxygen and release it through the air. therefore, the government should preserve its wil...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns' health and nature itself. In addition, by preserving nature, many ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 223, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...the Pacific Coast by the United States. they could study the area's plants, ani...
^^^^
Line 13, column 443, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...ple can improve scientific achievement. therefore, it is vital that government should pro...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ernment should protect its nature. In conclusion, I think the government sh...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, as for, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 337.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51928783383 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97134746796 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528189910979 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.884390906 60.3974514979 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.5454545455 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3181818182 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 5.21951772744 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318633995262 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930023111071 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991107200932 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189228262679 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0950888641041 0.0667264976115 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.14 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.