Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Art revives aesthetic and empathy in human beings. In the modern era where people have become workaholic in order to thrive and support their own country to strive in every avenues, the pervasive nature of art to remind a person who is and keep him grounded in very pivotal. With its very nature it gives human being perspective to see one thing in a mélange of aspects, thus opening further opportunities and prosperity. To flourish art and available it to sector of people from urban to rural corner of a nation government intervention is indeed important but it is also true that this very intention might harm the art itself as protector sometimes become the consumer itself. No matter who finance or organizes the path of arts, the content of this very thing must be protected.
Government of any nation is responsible for the betterment of the country. Their work should be for the country and its people not any other way around. But the current situation in many countries like China, North Korea, Bangladesh, India etc. be it a democratic country or a despotic country the government tis taking full control and using its power to manipulate the system in its own favor to keep themselves in power. It is in this profound predicaments that the Art in the hand of government might lose its authenticity and many artist might not express themselves in fear to getting harassed or arrested or flagged by government.
In North Korea, the art and literature and even the text books are controlled by the government by its state owned publishing company. In Bangladesh a very recent trend started where people criticizing government even from their own social media accounts are flagged under ICT law and in some cases even arrested. The recent case in India where a citizen talking over phone in UBER about the citizenship amendment law keeping his opinion against in were taken to police station by the driver and to everyone’s astonishment the Uber driver was reward by the government. The tyranny in this countries exist in every avenue of the citizen’s social and political life. Art in the hand of these government will be crushed let alone flourish.
Imagine the era where Pablo Picasso is instructed to paint as per a set of instruction. The world would not have any Pablo Picasso. Art and literature demand free expression. If an artist fear that he might face consequences because of this very work he produced will impede his growth and the nation might lose a great work. Is it quite impossible for any organization or human being to take this sector to the remote area of any nation because organization needs financing and of course drives by profit for sustainability. Is the Government who has the capability to reach the furthest corner and to everyone, also it a government’s duty to do so. With advancement of technology and digitalization through mobile devices and web to store all the literary work it became much easier to burgeon in this sector, the only requirement is true intention and will power of the Government for enhancement of its citizen.
It is said by Walt Whitman that “To have great poets there must be great audience”. Adding further to this I would say that to develop great audience we must create an environment where audience can get access to bundle of works in different arena of their choice and this expedition is possible with Government intervention in process acceleration not the content of the art or the mind of the artist.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 585, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...eward by the government. The tyranny in this countries exist in every avenue of the ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 685, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this government' or 'these governments'?
Suggestion: this government; these governments
... and political life. Art in the hand of these government will be crushed let alone flourish. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of the art or the mind of the artist.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, thus, of course, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 58.6224719101 152% => OK
Nominalization: 34.0 12.9106741573 263% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2901.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 597.0 442.535393258 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85929648241 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94303383012 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77799420608 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 293.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490787269682 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 932.4 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.5223981971 60.3974514979 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.875 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.29166666667 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243521793475 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736605390111 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073331232409 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139989911595 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491799095247 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 100.480337079 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.