Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">Art literaly means creative activity. The author has presented two contrasting views of two dissimilar group of people. One, that believes that funding towads the field of art should be made available by the government to ensure that it can bloom and is also made available to people. However the other group contradicts the earlier because it visualizes this government funding towards art can corrupt the originality of it which will result in loosing the integrity of it. While I understand the views of the second group, but I am more closely aligned with the first one, reasons for which have been illustrated throughout this essay.
Those people who do not believe that the funding should be provided fear the change in the world of art. Art being a very generic term, let mespecify the various we are talking about. It could be the world of artists or painters, art of acting, art of music, art of writing, art of photographyand many more. If we see the history of any area of art, we have come a long way with many changes over the period of time, which makes me declare thischange as inevitabe. This junta feels that the originality of art should not errode. Even though I believe that there are some deviations that occur, butisn't that deviation that is required or as justified by its name "Arts".
Now as it is clear that the name of this creativity or changes in a pleasing way is art, then why stop it. Now as we know as precedented that these changeare inevitible then why try to hinder it. Just in the name of preserving cultural traditions, which is definitely important but how about creating more?Isn't that more positive way of looking at things. We are not loosing the originality, the classic music that was produced decades back, or the paintings made hundreds of years back are still preserved and cherished. By providing funds to the world of art will help people to bring the creativity of their wonderfulminds out, something that will be cherished by coming generations. Definitely, keeping in mind that this birth of new world of art is at the cost of demolishing ourancestral ones.
Illustrating, what I stated above with an example, Verli painting very peculiar to the West of India is a painting where human trees everything is represented in stick forms. This is hundreds of years old way of painting, recently I countered a small variation done to it in a museum where it was a combination of sticks and dots.This variation looked more appealing than the original and has become a trend, clothes are coming up with this type of painting now, mobile covers can be seen paintedwith this type, hence has gained popularity. If we see here no one has destroyed the earlier version of it, its just that the new idea had added up to the existing art,hence increasing the spectrum of paintings.
As it is evident that promoting art is for the betterment of the society and paying contributions to te world of art itsel, it should be promoted and supported with thefunds by the government so that it can be made easily available to the masses to try their creativity. We can preserve and create a history simultaneously.</span><br>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'group' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'groups'.
Suggestion: groups
...two contrasting views of two dissimilar group of people. One, that believes that fund...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...m and is also made available to people. However the other group contradicts the earlier...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 491, Rule ID: LOOSING_EFFORTRECORDSEASON[1]
Message: Did you mean 'losing the'?
Suggestion: losing the
... originality of it which will result in loosing the integrity of it. While I understand th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 402, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e a long way with many changes over the period of time, which makes me declare thischange as i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 64, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a pleasing way" with adverb for "pleasing"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... the name of this creativity or changes in a pleasing way is art, then why stop it. Now as we kno...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 307, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Isnt
...y important but how about creating more?Isnt that more positive way of looking at th...
^^^^
Line 6, column 307, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Isn't
...y important but how about creating more?Isnt that more positive way of looking at th...
^^^^
Line 6, column 368, Rule ID: LOOSING_EFFORTRECORDSEASON[1]
Message: Did you mean 'losing the'?
Suggestion: losing the
...ve way of looking at things. We are not loosing the originality, the classic music that wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... We are not loosing the originality, the classic music that was produced decades ...
^^
Line 8, column 331, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...it was a combination of sticks and dots.This variation looked more appealing than th...
^^^^
Line 8, column 664, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , hence
...ew idea had added up to the existing art,hence increasing the spectrum of paintings. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, look, second, so, still, then, while, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.3162921348 221% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 60.0 33.0505617978 182% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2673.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 550.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04648557853 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 215.323595506 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516363636364 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 828.9 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.4863502115 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04545454545 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344173951038 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103517712674 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101055111278 0.0758088955206 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19672452343 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109969747002 0.0667264976115 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 100.480337079 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.