Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are unwarranted, based on the existing evidence for global climate change.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The developed nations are those who are providing the basic lifestyle to their citizen without any obstacle, they are economically balanced and established. Developing nations are trying to provide the fundamental live hood to their country man and struggling to maintain their economy. There are two believes arrived here: one for the people who believed that to live in developed country is crucial to sustain the quality of life style as well as reduce the energy consumption. On contrary, some believe that drastic change in global climate is the consequence of the life style followed in developed. As far as I am concerned, the lifestyle trends in developed country are the one of the fundamental reason of weather change. I will provide some reasonable description and instances in following paragraph to strengthen my assertion.
First and foremost, the luxury life style includes a person individual vehicle to commute to work place. The increase in flow of vehicles on road leads two problems. One, it is increase the crowd on road which can lead the more probability of accident. Second, is it will create unnecessary air pollution as emission of smoke from the fuel of vehicle. I have an example to demonstrate my view, as we know the public transport in USA is about to negligible and people use their own vehicle to commute any where either going to market of work place. It will lead the deleterious effect in respect to environment pollution and usage of energy resources. On contrary, the developing nations, like India and India, people usually won’t effort the individual vehicle so they use the public vehicles for transportation so they can save the energy resources consumption.
Secondly, as the developed country providing the luxury life to their residents and people in developed country can effort the air condition which emit the most dangerous gases i.e. chlorofluorocarbon, which is the crucial source to make a hole in ozone layer over the Atlantic. The hole in the ozone layer can lead the most deleterious result to all human being as well as flora and fauna. On the other hand, the developing country is having more plants and comparatively low constructions so they are boon effect on environment.
In addition, we cannot deny the fact that the life style in developed county is more stable and luxuries, but at the same time the luxuries life can lead detrimental effect to all human being and environment. On the other hand, the life in developing country is not up to mark but as they are not touching much the natural resources so they are not contributing towards the depletion of nature.
In conclusion, in a word owning from aforementioned reasonable cause and elucidation description from previous paragraph, I will good to draw a conclusion that the life in developed country is stable but it can lead injurious effect to mankind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 500, Rule ID: ANY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anywhere'?
Suggestion: anywhere
...people use their own vehicle to commute any where either going to market of work place. I...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 132, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'luxuries'' or 'luxury's'?
Suggestion: luxuries'; luxury's
... and luxuries, but at the same time the luxuries life can lead detrimental effect to all...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2413.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 479.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0375782881 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92065985097 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459290187891 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 788.4 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4201601552 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2105263158 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253982012517 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760789387213 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682751031301 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123986811462 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103749460768 0.0667264976115 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.