Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.
Do you agree or disagree?
This is the contentious statement that academics curriculum is more focus towards learning the facts instead of practical knowledge. This statement has sparked a heated debate among many. I will provide the pros and cons of the statement, and at last my point of view.
To begin with, the benefits of learning the facts, first, the initial stage of any practical work is the requirement gathering. In this step need to collect the merits and demerit of an experiment, and the material required to complete it successfully. Theoretical learning is fundamental to get all the above basic requirement. Second, as someone said, ' to get success in future, one should learn from the mistakes of history'. To achieve any milestone in future, it's required to know about the facts happened in history. In addition, some of the skills i.e. 'General Awareness and General Knowledge' won't have any practicum, to become the master of the subjects need to learn the facts.
On contrary, too much theory without any experiment lead the deleterious results. Just memorize the facts will not be last too long, they will vanish with time. The knowledge comes with experimental results will be last forever and not be forgettable easily. For instance, mathematics equation and formula's won't easy to mug up but, if understands the concept behind them then any formula can be simple and easy to learn.
Having considered the range of the argument, I firmly believe the merits of learning the facts is weighted upon the practical knowledge. I am here, not denying the importance of practical knowledge, but the learning of facts is also required to make minimal mistakes in future work, to get the initial requirement of any experiments, and to make oneself aware about the current affairs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'academics'' or 'academic's'?
Suggestion: academics'; academic's
This is the contentious statement that academics curriculum is more focus towards learni...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic requirement. Second, as someone said, to get success in future, one should lea...
^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...econd, as someone said, to get success in future, one should learn from the mistakes of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...es of history. To achieve any milestone in future, its required to know about the facts h...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...facts happened in history. In addition, some of the skills i.e. General Awareness and Gener...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then, for instance, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05460750853 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75256342981 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57337883959 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2325688012 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185792603943 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617982134168 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045075685391 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105258159238 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299216516206 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.