Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are

For all that matter, energy is a finite resource and it is incumbent upon each and every on the earth to save energy such that our present and more importantly, future generations can sustain. The issue here presents two different notions, one, which states that people of developed nation should reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle , given the situation of global climate change. Conversely, another statement is made stating that such drastic lifestyle changes are unjustified. It is assumed that we have a choice, to save energy or not.

Firstly, it is not only imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption, it is a responsibility of each and every individual to save energy whenever possible. There are mainly two kinds of nation, developed and the other ones, which are developing. Developed nations have better education system, better health care and more importantly, fecund citizens who thrive to make their nation more advanced. People living in developed nations have resources at their disposal to device mechanisms which can be used by everyone to save the mother earth from global warming. For example, more people in developed nations can afford electric cars and moreover, have electric charging stations which might not be possible in developing countries like India.

On the other hand, to say that such drastic lifestyle change is unwarranted is like running away from your responsibility. In developing nations, major population is in the middle-class section which have a decent income to sustain their lives. It would be harsh in such scenarios to make drastic changes in their lifestyle, given the burden and pressure they already have for sustaining their own lives. To the contrary, in developed nations, rather than being intransigent, people can make small changes in their lives and can set an example for the other population on earth to learn from them and gradually adapt those changes in their lives. For example, individuals can take bicycle to their work places as separate roads are available, which would also not undermine their safety.

Finally, given the situation of global climate change, each and every individual, should contribute to saving more energy for the future and use more energy efficient ways to achieve their day to day tasks. It is also demanding on one hand of any individual to make changes in their lifestyle, but looking at the larger picture, these small changes will make huge impact on the global scale.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 367, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...on and lead a more sustainable lifestyle , given the situation of global climate c...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, so, for example, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2143.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 411.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21411192214 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67620064839 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493917274939 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0401222852 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.9375 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6875 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462946843777 0.243740707755 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154904218075 0.0831039109588 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769175753002 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289047859612 0.150359130593 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407487291859 0.0667264976115 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.