Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are unwarranted, based on the existing evidence for global climate change.
Global climate change has been the burning issue since the last decade, or so. The unusual change in climatic condition has been so unpredictable lately. The issue relates to the human population and their use of natural resources. People have been consuming, if not exploiting, the natural resources in a large amount. The issue presents that the people should reduce the energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle rather than exploiting the resources as a result of global climatic change. I agree with the issue although such drastic change in lifestyle, to make up for the current global climatic change, might not guarranted.
With the rapid growth of human population, their needs and demands are ever so rising. To fulfill their needs, the first thing they consume is the natural resources around them. For instance, people rely on forests for construction of houses which leads to deforestation. And as we all know deforestation eventually leads to global warming as the amount of oxygen produced decreases. If people could rely less on natural resources for fulfilling their basic needs by adjusting their lifestyle, then the problem of global climate change can be lessened to some extent.
In addition to exploitation of forests, rise in human population also leads to increase in the number of industries, factories and urbanization. The industries consumes a lot of natural resources and also produces a huge amount of waste materials and harmful gases, which has direct impact on global climate change. If people could live without extravagant demands for material goods being produced from factories, then the negative effect of such industries on environment would be less as they will be running in lesser numbers. Further, if people could arrange their settlement in countrysides rather than exploiting the arable lands in the name of urbanization, natural resources could be protected which will have positive impact on global climate.
Although, the change in people's lifestyle can have great impact on global climate change, we are not quite sure whether today's human would be able to change their living or not. Looking at the trend on last two to three decade, people have been accustomed to live in the state of adverse climatic conditions and would do a little in adjusting their lifestyle in response to the situation of the global ecosystem.
To sum up, the adverse effect of global climate change is rising day by day and soon our planet might become an unsuitable place to live. Thus, looking at the near future, people should change their current lifestyle and rely less on natural resources for sustainment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 623, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for the current global climatic change, might not guarranted. With the rapi...
^^
Line 1, column 647, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...climatic change, might not guarranted. With the rapid growth of human populatio...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'consume'.
Suggestion: consume
...tories and urbanization. The industries consumes a lot of natural resources and also pro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...industries on environment would be less as they will be running in lesser numbers....
^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'decade' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'decades'.
Suggestion: decades
...oking at the trend on last two to three decade, people have been accustomed to live in...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[4]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'accustomed to living'.
Suggestion: accustomed to living
...t two to three decade, people have been accustomed to live in the state of adverse climatic condit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, so, then, thus, for instance, in addition, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2234.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18329466357 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70678068528 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480278422274 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6591749848 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.578947368 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6842105263 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63157894737 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321507672486 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105531202464 0.0831039109588 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779867738392 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193043360427 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604565789469 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.