Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.
Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably decline.
Online "blogosphere" provides a platform to publish political opinions easily which certainly impacts the quality of political discourse in the United States. As one can find the political news and the discussion on political topics with ease in online medium, a few would bother researching by themselves on the topic. This undermines the quality of political discourse which once used to consists of pure logic and creativity of the person involved the process.
These days it has become easy to publish political opinions easily via online medium. Anyone with the access to internet is free to express his/her opinion without little discord from the outsiders. Noone is going to object on what is written until they have been read. Such freedom can result in the illogical and obscure political opinions. If similar opinions is put forward into discussion in a mass of people, there will immediately be objection from some of the people concerned which doesn't allow illogical political opinions to be regarded as true.
Further, as political opinions are easily available in the internet posted by many people, many would rather steal the writing of others in the name of being popular. They would be disinclined toward writing something on their own which leads to lack of creativity in the political opinions. As people find it easy to discuss regarding the topics in online medium, such as in comments and chats, there will be less interaction between people which hinders the possibility of innovative idea being discovered. Had the same conversation been done in real time, there would have been better discussion and the end result would be fruitful.
Online blogosphere has made people lazy as they can write anything lying on the corner of a room. Had they travelled to places to cover news on political topics, they would have met many people on the way and who knows, whether they also share the same idea. This would lead to a fruitful conversation and might give birth to a new political idea. Thus, the online medium, although have their fare share of advantage, has weakened the quality of political discourse to a great extent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 401, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'consist'.
Suggestion: consist
... political discourse which once used to consists of pure logic and creativity of the per...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...here will immediately be objection from some of the people concerned which doesnt allow ill...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...from some of the people concerned which doesnt allow illogical political opinions to b...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, thus, such as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08146067416 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73357618704 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502808988764 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.043967734 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0625 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5625 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3152264398 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114257190731 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862612428203 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214078919234 0.150359130593 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10814610021 0.0667264976115 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.