Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Political leaders of a country are elected into power by it's citizens. It is therefore the duty of a political leader or a public servant to work for the citizens. Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon the principles for the sake of compromise. On the other hand, some believe that the quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives. In my opinion, these two statements are extreme in nature and a right balance between these two would go about a long way in satisfying both, the citizens and the political leaders. The paragraphs below will elucidate my reasoning behind this neutral stance.
Citizens often voice their displeasure against the incumbent government due to it's inefficiency in providing promised resources and infrastructure to the country. Therefore, the citizens believe that these political leaders should give up their objectives and principles and yield to public opinion as a form of compromise. Such a feet, a compromise among st all the myriad classes and sects of people, residing in a country is a tough ask. For example, a country such as India, which is the home to myriad religions and sects have different demands and different ways to fulfill them. Therefore, a government would find it really hard to please all the religions and come to a compromise. A compromise in a such a situation could probably lead to a disappointing outcome for both the feuding groups. The citizens should let the higher authority of the country decide the final outcome and believe in them. A route of compromise would be detrimental for the political party itself. Such a plan would lead to widespread disappointment amongst the common people, owing to the weak decisions being made by the government. Therefore, ruling party could end up loosing future elections. A definitive decision would help the political party maintain it's grip hold over the nation at the expense of few disappointed citizens.
If the political leader does not yield to public opinion and adhere to his principles and objectives. He can gain a false sense of independence. A feeling that he does not have to answer to anyone. This could mean that he can do whatever pleases him. A political leader with unjust political ideologies would probably look towards hurting the national economy by aggrandizing the wealth of the hard-working people which they pay as taxes. Allowing a political leader, a free ride to do whatever he or she wants is a call for trouble. Moreover, it is sometimes the people who grow agitated since they do not see significant progress in the welfare of the country. They feel that the political leaders are not doing right by them, by following unjust political ideologies. In such a case, citizens should wait and comprehend the tasks done by the political leaders before warning them to yield in front of the public.
In sum, any of the above route can be a cause of concern for either the political leaders or the citizens. The above suggested measure are extreme in nature. Therefore, a better solution would be to let both classes of individuals to work in harmony, so that it leads to the collective good of the nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a foot' or simply 'feet'?
Suggestion: a foot; feet
...c opinion as a form of compromise. Such a feet, a compromise among st all the myriad c...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: FOOT_FEET[1]
Message: 'foot' is the singular form of 'feet'. Consider using 'foot'?
Suggestion: foot
...opinion as a form of compromise. Such a feet, a compromise among st all the myriad c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, really, so, therefore, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2738.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 552.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96014492754 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84713113593 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84245307569 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471014492754 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 883.8 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 15.0 4.99550561798 300% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.590029996 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4137931034 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0344827586 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.34482758621 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379842820061 0.243740707755 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960384192811 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135065504776 0.0758088955206 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230082390523 0.150359130593 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162048933765 0.0667264976115 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.