Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
In the society, there always be 4 groups of people. First will be strong supporters of general doctrine. Second will be strong opponents of that doctrine. Third will be oportunists, they will tend to follow either of the group which will beneficial for them. Lastly, the fourth one, which cannot be named, as they no longer get affected by any doctrine, they are in their own world. Ideally, a political leader must always please these all 4 groups in order to be effective. But, practically, it is impossible, eventhough how much ever good is any course of action it is always going to be opposed by atleast one group unless they experience its benefits.Unlikely, if a political leader remains committed to particular principles and objectives, it becomes more convenient for him/her to influence the opponents i.e. that group(s) of people as he/she stands firm on certain principles.
The Netflix series,'House of Cards'; depicts the US political affairs which Ms. Hilary Clinton quotes is most closest and honest imitation of US politics. The main character Mr. Francis Underwood thrives to be a President of USA by trickery and diplomacy. Though, he always follows his own path paved on moral pricipals and aims. His presidential term has one aim to enforce 'America Works'- a job spree to americans , in his 1st term. He had ultimate aim, to mitigate the poverty by providing ample job opportunities to Americans. In spite of this, he was opposed by many within the senate as well as oustside commoners. But still he kept on enforcing unless natives applauded him once 'America Works' came into action. Which in turn, guarenteed his win for the 2nd term of presidency and victory in comming elections.
On the other hand, his running opponent for presidential election was laid mostly by publicity wave. He tends to mend his ways according to public opinion in order to whip votes. His advisery team was forced to come up with the solutions and plan of actions which depends mostly on public interests. For the same, he relied on digital statistics yielded from people's internet interests which was a shady grey work. This course of action made him fall prey to the trap set by his Mr. francis Underwood and had to withdraw his application from the Election.
From above example, one can infer that, if one remains committed to his aims and objectives one is most likely to be a effective leader. Though, the path is hard and enduring people applaudes you when the result is beneficial for them. No matter how much you try to derive a perfect solution for people's issues, there always will be a group of natives which will oppose your point of view. Hence it is better to follow own principles and morals , atleast one can defend his own stand effectively. As the arbirtary definition of 'effective leader' states, effective leader is one who persuades his citizens and leads them on the path to development . Hence rather by mending ways according to public opinion it is viable to proceed on the path supported by moral pillars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'be'.
Suggestion: be always
In the society, there always be 4 groups of people. First will be stron...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 656, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Unlikely
...oup unless they experience its benefits.Unlikely, if a political leader remains committe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 19, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , House
...ain principles. The Netflix series,House of Cards; depicts the US political affa...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'closest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: closest
...airs which Ms. Hilary Clinton quotes is most closest and honest imitation of US politics. Th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 413, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... America Works- a job spree to americans , in his 1st term. He had ultimate aim, t...
^^
Line 9, column 118, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...and objectives one is most likely to be a effective leader. Though, the path is h...
^
Line 9, column 391, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...s which will oppose your point of view. Hence it is better to follow own principles a...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 445, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tter to follow own principles and morals , atleast one can defend his own stand ef...
^^
Line 9, column 646, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nd leads them on the path to development . Hence rather by mending ways according ...
^^
Line 9, column 649, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...leads them on the path to development . Hence rather by mending ways according to pub...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, lastly, second, so, still, third, well, as for, as well as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2520.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 516.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88372093023 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69483353409 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 215.323595506 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542635658915 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 783.9 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 65.0754341528 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9230769231 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.34615384615 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19209099264 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526742858467 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519121630486 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115377650484 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579519235856 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.