Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Some claim that political leaders should abandon principle and yield to the public opinions, however, others believe that leaders should persist in the committed to particular principles. I agree with the latter statement that an effective political leader should remain particular principles rather than compromise with the public opinion.
An effective political leader has the responsibility to make decisions that profit the whole society, but the public’s opinions usually benefit only a particular group of people, leaders should consider more than just public opinions. As an example, people often asked for decreasing taxes or even free taxes. If the political leader compromise with the argument and decreases taxes, the country may consequently bankrupt after a few years. An effective public leader has the responsibility to maintain the welfare of the society, thus it is unpractical to abandon principles in order to compromise the public arguments.
Additionally, committing to the promise shows the credibility of a leader and will make people trust them more. A politician who take an effort to persist in the principles is a perfect leader who can stand for the public. On the other hand, a political leader who breaks the promise they made before, in order to compromise with the criticisms, indicates that he is unstable in his/her manifesto. People often think of them as unreliable and will not vote for them in the next election.
Finally, consistently committed to particular principles and objectives show the core value of the party or politician, it may be confusing if a politician often compromises with public opinion and change his/her position. For instance, there is a leader who used to be opposed to the legalization of same-sex marriage but he wrote a post about supporting LGBTQ on social media after a few years for some political reason. The contradictory movement not only shows that he is an inconsistent person but also confused the supporters.
In conclusion, although public opinion plays a role in political decision, an effective political leader should commit to certain principles and objectives in order to maintain the stability of society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r to maintain the stability of society.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, however, if, may, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 346.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36994219653 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96791399503 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491329479769 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8446566436 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.714285714 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 5.21951772744 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.450424296093 0.243740707755 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159332735419 0.0831039109588 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908280161063 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265803575682 0.150359130593 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804867766171 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.