Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The topic can be interpreted from different angles for examining qualities of an effective leader. Indubitably, an effective leader must stick to the principles and objective which solely points towards the wellness of citizens in every aspect. Nevertheless, he must respond to the public opinion because people know in a better way of things they need. A leader must revert to this requirement by proposing a plan in front of the people based on that opinion. Hence, I believe that an effective leader must be capable of yielding to public opinion but abandon only those principles which do not align to citizen's wellness.
First of all, people are smart enough to decide their goodwill and take decisions. They know more about their needs and necessities, their problems than anyone else. To illustrate, people living in slum areas know their problems much better than a municipal corporation member assigned to the welfare of the people living in slum areas. In this circumstance, the leader must ask for the public opinion and consider that sincerely. He should be liberal and effective to apply his knowledge to give direction to the people to achieve the requirements. Furthermore, if he does not considers people's opinion and point of view, it might happen that he would initiate public welfare programmes that are completely misaligned to the actual requirements of the people in that area. He must overrule any barriers and principles which stands in front of him to perform welfare to the people but not to harm anyone. Apparently, an effective leader must respond to the public needs by considering their opinions and overruling any barriers and rules which stands in front of the welfare of the citizens.
Admittedly, an effective leader must know how to take right decisions for his followers and commit to those principles and values in any situation. This is especially true when the leader knows from statistics and study that there will be an inflation which will cause problems for the citizens before achieving the goal. In addition to that, a leader is aware of all harmful consequences that will come after taking the decision which seems right to him. However, this should not lead to a dictatorship. The leader must convey the difficulties which will eventually lead to overall welfare to his followers properly. And they must be capable to adhere and persevere those principles and objectives till the target is not achieved at times of crises. Hence, one should not hold on to the capability of a leader to stick to his principles for measuring his effectiveness in leading his followers.
In conclusion, as long as leaders know inside out of his principles and objectives he should stick to them till success. In other cases, he must seek public opinion for the betterment of public and must not rule his principles and objectives as a dictator if they are making harm to his public in any aspect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 579, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'consider'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: consider
...quirements. Furthermore, if he does not considers peoples opinion and point of view, it m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 579, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'consider'
Suggestion: consider
...quirements. Furthermore, if he does not considers peoples opinion and point of view, it m...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2444.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 489.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99795501022 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74724416544 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443762781186 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 764.1 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.177935847 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.090909091 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2272727273 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333370986643 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112804910182 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801374816427 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231449506452 0.150359130593 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976339544279 0.0667264976115 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.