Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The author of issue contends that there are some people who may hold the view that governors should overlook their thoughts and merely rely on the public opinion for making the agreed rules. On the other hand, there are some other people who have the opposite viewpoint. They believe that the consistency attitude of the leader is the crux benchmark of an effective leader. In what follows, I will discuss the possible clues posited by both groups and then my own position would be delineated.
Those people who argue that the ruler should ignore his stand and have the exchange of idea by public seem to weight to citizens’ requirement instead of the governments’ perspectives. Indeed, nowadays the modernization provides the democratic nation, whose leader is by the people, of the people, and for the people. This assumption could be conducted that there is a cogent interconnection between the governor of a nation and its denizens. In this scenario, who it is possible to ignore the one part of connection for making a decision about the society.
As was stated, there are some others who think a governor should have a fixed stand to do an effective action in society. It could be assumed that this group considered the persistence attitude as the key factor of success of the leader and making him or her as an idiosyncrasy of society. This assumption also verifies by some leaders in history. For instance, Gandhi with his eager for dispersion of peace, or Hitler with his promotion of Nazism, or Mussolini with his Fascism attitude are famous after years. In addition, there is no doubt they will be recalled in the future; although their fame values are arguable. This salience is due to their consistent attitude which they never relinquish.
I should say that my perspective is between these two views. While the importance of the steadiness for success is undeniable, the contraction with people is also crucial for making a great decision. In fact, a disciplined person is defined according to its steadiness of desire. The program which guaranteed the thrive and triumph. Consequently, with this attitude, the success of nation is so high. However, this steadiness should be based on public requirements and demand and not the sole desire of ruler. This awareness from the demand is possible when there is a connection between the individuals and governors for delivering the ideas.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned argument illustrates that both attitudes are missing an important point. Therefore, the governor’s consistent objective reservation by the knowledge of the citizens’ requirements and willing could lead to an effective type of governing system in society
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 309, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...of desire. The program which guaranteed the thrive and triumph. Consequently, with this at...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tive type of governing system in society
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in fact, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2273.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 444.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11936936937 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95264257331 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502252252252 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.945549365 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8260869565 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3043478261 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86956521739 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208286183286 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589992022131 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658598061189 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120675992346 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772757789201 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.