Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Nowadays, political issues, especially, leader's behavior has gotten important. Despite this fact, there is a controversial question expressing whether the leader has to compromise and change his purposes for the nation's opinion. I am afraid, I disagree with changing goals for satisfying people. The reasons to substantiate my idea is explored in the following.
To begin with, abandoning principle and changing goals has influenced society. To put on the other hand, the leader has to lead the society for improvement and reaching the goals and changing this purpose has negative effects on the people of the country. Under such a circumstance, people don't know what is their goals and what should they do for the improvement of their country. To easily perceive my words, consider the leader wanting to change educational laws for poor students, he needs to prepare a budget for this goal and this happening can make problems for the people. If he changes his goal after each criticism, he will make a problem for society and the people who are led by him.
Furthermore, conducting people and also deluding them are simple to work which can happen by media. To be specific, sometimes powerful guys which are losing their power after reforming try to change public opinion about the leader's purposes. Surely, the leader has to try to explain these kinds of difficulties for the people and let them take part in the process of reforming. A famous example can drive this fact home, regard Gandi and his tenet, however, a lot of people decided to destroy him and his goal for Indian people, he never accepts the failure and always speaks with his people and let them cooperate in political issues.
Without any shadow of a doubt, compromise has its positive effects like reforming and prevent a brawl. It is true, sometimes the leader makes mistakes hence he should try to find a solution for that. It is crystal clear, making mistake isn't a bad thing for a leader but not trying to solve that and try to vanish it, is an unusual thing. Public opinion to reform mistakes is useful. To make my point of view clear, see the USA and the people's opinion about the war, these can prevent new wars all over the world and also compel their leader to compromise.
In conclusion, I do believe changing goals and abandoning principles is not a good choice for a leader. Since it has negative effects on society, also sometimes people's opinions are conducting by media. However, in some cases compromise for public opinion is useful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...promise and change his purposes for the nations opinion. I am afraid, I disagree with c...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 290, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ntry. Under such a circumstance, people dont know what is their goals and what shoul...
^^^^
Line 4, column 236, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...at. It is crystal clear, making mistake isnt a bad thing for a leader but not trying...
^^^^
Line 4, column 435, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...oint of view clear, see the USA and the peoples opinion about the war, these can preven...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, as to, in conclusion, i am afraid, in some cases, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2096.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86310904872 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57056043809 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512761020882 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2993758498 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8095238095 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5238095238 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7619047619 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257958145948 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849354682642 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511515000816 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1644091614 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624239931453 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.