The basic tenets of morality and logical reasoning are really very different. So much, as they may appear to be disparate forms of philosophies. Moral studies combine the knowledge of wise saints, thinkers, spiritual gurus to be passed on to neophytes in a didactic fashion. The popular forms of teaching moral science is a doctrinaire method, where pupils learn and recite the texts from the book in the form of allegories, anecdotes and fables. Whereas logical reasoning is a rational school of thought applicable to all fields of existing human understanding, and beyond. Objectivity is an inherent characteristic of reasoning.
Imbibing ultimate knowledge through moral preachings seems infeasible. To become a complete individual, in order to possess the judgement of right and wrong, one must become a well-rounded learned scholar. There is little impact of such a kind that rote learning of a few scriptures and sagacious quotations from the past provides with. In contrast, having the foundation of a reasoning seems to be much more promising. Well reasoned citizens have a keen insight about the broad spectrum of what is moral or immoral; also, the fine distinction between the nuances of virtuousness. It is this deductive power that the logical reasoning endows its followers with that is indispensable.
Granted that inculcating esteemed values in aid with moral teachings produces honorable mindsets, but the distinction of what is moral and what is not, remains in the hands of the instructor. If a moral mode of teaching is applied in society, the countably few headmasters are going to have a huge amount of power to mould the youth: who ultimately direct the course of a nation's progress. It would be a state of quandary to determine a proper syllabus for teaching. In contrast, this issue does not arise with the teaching of logical reasoning on the whole; as it is a syllogism, a study of causality.
Nevertheless, claiming endorsing the sole teaching of logical reasoning would be going too far. Good moral values inculcated from an early age serves to produce compassionate, respectable people in the future. What a kid absorbs in the early stages of a life becomes a permanent accomplice for his lifetime, thus, it would be beneficial if students learn few high held principles in the nurturing period.
In essence, laying moral science as the foundation of education shall not serve the purpose of producing a moral society. What it does not provide is the nuances, which is given by the reason
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a didactic fashion" with adverb for "didactic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...tual gurus to be passed on to neophytes in a didactic fashion. The popular forms of teaching moral sc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...what is not, remains in the hands of the instructor. If a moral mode of teaching ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, nevertheless, really, so, thus, well, whereas, in contrast, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2117.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 414.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11352657005 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97277450716 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562801932367 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5787399538 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.80952381 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38095238095 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339792096312 0.243740707755 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910881782366 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673362222815 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191282126174 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374567788509 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.