Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal. Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus
Politics is a very complex subject, and so is the issue of what it should pursue. I, personally believe that the goal of politics should be finding a common ground and reaching reasonable consensus. Talking about ideals in politics might sound unreal. Politics revolves around the needs of public, and pursuit of a particular ideal might not align with the ideology of common people. Appeasing an entire population by creating a "win-win" situation for everybody should be the foremost priority of politics.
Political policies directly affect the day-to-day life of each and every person. Pursuit of an ideal might work positively for a particular section of society, but it is highly possible that the other section gets perturbed by those policies. For example, there would be a sky high difference between the goals of a rural population and that of an urban one. In these situations, the most appropriate action should be to reach a common ground which reap fruitful results for all the folks. Again, this would lead the nation onto the the path of progress without any hindrance. Also, the faith of people in government would remain sock steady if a reasonable resolution is churned out.
Moreover, this is an era of globalization. A nation will be singled out, if its policies don't take into consideration other country's religious and cultural ideas. A best example here would be of North Korea. The country has long isolated itself from others and has progressed nowhere. On the other hand, the USA have thrived by leaps and bounds. This is because they are open to all cultures, and their policies fit anyone coming from any corner of the world.
Conversely, politics should not sideline the ideals that are common to majority of the population. Ideals like basic standard of living, good educational and medical facilities are something which every citizen looks for. No compromise should be made on this front. Pursuit of such ideals will not only appease people, but also help in cementing their confidence in the government.
To conclude, politics should mainly focus on the betterment of people by giving minimal mileage to ideals that don't work for an entire population. This is possible, only if a common ground is found by keeping in mind the goals of every section of the society and reaching a reasonable resolution. However, certain ideals aforementioned that are in interest of all the citizens, should never be compromised.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 428, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...easing an entire population by creating a 'win-win' situation for every...
^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... Again, this would lead the nation onto the the path of progress without any hindrance....
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... Again, this would lead the nation onto the the path of progress without any hindrance....
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...on will be singled out, if its policies dont take into consideration other countrys ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: The
... countrys religious and cultural ideas. A best example here would be of North Kor...
^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[7]
Message: The word 'anyone' in subjunctive clause must be used with a base form of a verb: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...cultures, and their policies fit anyone coming from any corner of the world. Conver...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 112, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...y giving minimal mileage to ideals that dont work for an entire population. This is ...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'conversely', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'so', 'for example', 'talking about', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.23127753304 0.240241500013 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.140969162996 0.157235817809 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0925110132159 0.0880659088768 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0484581497797 0.0497285424764 97% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0176211453744 0.0444667217837 40% => OK
Prepositions: 0.13436123348 0.12292977631 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0418502202643 0.0406280797675 103% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.78035655333 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.011013215859 0.030933414821 36% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00440528634361 0.0016655270985 264% => OK
Determiners: 0.129955947137 0.0997080785238 130% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0374449339207 0.0249443105267 150% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.011013215859 0.0148568991511 74% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2464.0 2732.02544248 90% => OK
No of words: 405.0 452.878318584 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.08395061728 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.4 0.366273622748 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.283950617284 0.280924506359 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.197530864198 0.200843997647 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.118518518519 0.132149295362 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78035655333 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 219.290929204 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545679012346 0.48968727796 111% => OK
Word variations: 62.4638657383 55.4138127331 113% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6194690265 116% => OK
Sentence length: 16.875 23.380412469 72% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2855401575 59.4972553346 58% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 141.124799967 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 23.380412469 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.458333333333 0.674092028746 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 45.2700617284 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.96808510638 1.64882698954 119% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.5788106099 0.391690518653 148% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0623574279032 0.123202303941 51% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0399093021675 0.077325440228 52% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.475340904028 0.547984918172 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.114659851515 0.149214159877 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197032847004 0.161403998019 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131060528 0.0892212321368 147% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.367877394816 0.385218514788 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0905227428967 0.0692045440612 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.389791893244 0.275328986314 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113814814863 0.0653680567796 174% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.