Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal. Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus.
In order to ensure the betterment of the mass people, political parties should find common ground and reach reasonable consensus, rather than relentlessly pursue after their own diverse political ideologies.
In ancient time, the number of people living in the society were small and it was possible for them to gather in a place and select a leader for them who will lead them. But, in this modern era such kind of election is impossible not only because of the size of the population but also for the divergent ideology that is existing among the people. Those diverse ideology creates conflicts among the follower of the political parties and causes disturbance in the society. So, for the betterment of the people of the society there is no alternative other than reaching a resaonable consensus among those parties and try to find out a common ground for the improvement and peace of the society.
For instance, in Bangladesh, though there are hundreds of political parties, two major political parties rule: BNP and Awami League. The political ideology of those parties are so divergent that it can never be assumed that those two parties have reached in a consensus on any particular matter. However, this disparate ideology is not helping the countrymen rather precluding the development of the nation and creating chaos. In any new project taken by Awami League, the ruling party now, the people who supports BNP finds a consensus among Awami League and the government of India for the fact that the political ideology of Awami League is mostly dependent on the support of India. Though sometimes there is no interest of the India government, the follower of BNP protest the project anyway. On the other hand, any political decision BNP takes, the follower of Awami League thinks there is something between Pakistan and BNP. Meanwhile, the people of Bangladesh is suffering and the political parties should give up pursuing their divergent ideologies and should reach a consensus the target of which will be to improve the nation and make the countrymen happy and rich.
If we think from much more broader perspective, from international perspective, the world today is divided in two ideology: Anti Islam and Islam. This disparate ideology is causing hardships for most of the people living in the earth, no one is getting benefited from this chaos. So, it is the duty of the leader of the worlds to reach a consensus to make a better world and should give up their divergent outlook. They should keep in mind, since man is mortal, no one will survive forever: all of us must die, so why creating chaos by following divergent ideology? Why not reach a common ground to make our life in the earth peaceful?
Though some will say that there are some topics on which the political parties can never reach into a common ground and should follow their own disparate ideologies, for the betterment of the country, for the betterment of the world they should sacrifice their interest when required. Each should give up their controversial point and should think about people and if they can do so it is not impossible to reach in a common ground.
Disparate ideology of the political parties is not helpful for the improvement of the mass people, and hence the political parties should sit together and come into a consensus for making the life of the people a peaceful one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 23, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'broader' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: broader
...happy and rich. If we think from much more broader perspective, from international perspec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, hence, however, if, look, so, while, for instance, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2814.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 574.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90243902439 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89472135074 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58992209602 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.414634146341 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 883.8 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.789659787 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.7 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251316498825 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862558035257 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771970917141 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157257540121 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06025144147 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.