Some people claim that a nation's government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state. Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Humans need balance in their daily life. Similarly, nature must also be balanced to have a stable economy. The author contends that some people prefer protecting animals by preserving their habitant while others argue that for the economic development of the nation, it is necessary to occupy animal’s habitant and develop potential development sites. In my opinion, I partially agree with both of the statements provided by the author for the following reasons.
To begin with, all living organisms on earth are dependent on each other in one or more ways; therefore, it is important to preserve all animals and birds and not destroy their habitants. The dependency of living organisms are termed as ‘ecosystem’. It is crucial to balance the ecosystem. For instance, the greatest predator eagle hunts for snakes; snakes eat mice; mice eat insects; insects eat plants; plants get minerals from soil. From the above chain, if snakes becomes extinct, then mice and insects will become abundant. Also, eagles will become extinct as snakes disappeared; therefore, each and every living creature is important for a balanced nature. If people destroy their habitant, they are prone to invade metropolitan cities, towns and villages, thus causing commotion. Moreover, it will also result in global warming if the balance is not maintained.
Also, if people build companies in animal habitant, it would be impossible to manage while taking into account the area they had to manage since it had been a wildlife habitat for decades. For example, if a forest is destroyed, and buildings are built there, animals won’t be convinced with the fact of humans conquering their space; therefore, they won’t leave their space. Even if humans had to capture all animals of the forest, it would cost a lot of money and space to occupy them else were.
However, economy is also important to take into account. Nowadays technology is developing at a faster rate and it is necessary to facilitate resources in more buildings but area is at shortage. Hence, it is important to consider forests and other areas where there are no human habitant. For example, Moor’s law states that for every 18 months, the number of silicon transistor with chips will increase. While considering the law, research and manufacturing industries are necessary to build new chips. Hence more land are required.
In conclusion, animals are important than the economy since animals play a great role in keeping the nature balanced. Thus, instead of occupying animal habitant areas, it is important to limit our usage, even if it has a potential for economic gain.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 279, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'habitants'?
Suggestion: habitants
...nd other areas where there are no human habitant. For example, Moor’s law states that fo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 504, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...tries are necessary to build new chips. Hence more land are required. In conclusion...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2207.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15654205607 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68319836286 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546728971963 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 713.7 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.1211121117 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9565217391 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6086956522 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78260869565 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174372700251 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443728138023 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483403504581 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101467385314 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049505372586 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.