Some tasks are for men only.
It is true that we, in any way, cannot ignore the physical differences in men and women which start becoming conspicuous after the onset of puberty. It is how the species is, and this part cannot be overlooked if we need to build a logical case for the argument. There is no denying that most men have more physical strength than most women. Gender roles emerged in the stone age have stayed rooted into the humankind manifesting in the form of patriarchy because of the kind of work that had been contributing to the economy of the country for a very long time. Jobs is previous eras have required physical stength. These differences, however, cease to create a divide in a modern worldview.
A lot has changed today. We live in the information age now and machines have taken over and humans have readied themselves for the welcome of "Industry 4.0" and even more digitization. With countries around the world engaging in the relentless pursuit of automation today, in the current context and job market, such physical differences stop standing in the way. It is known for a fact that both the genders are at par with each other in terms of cognitive abilities if they receive the same external conditioning. Psychologists, doctors and sociologists have been trying to prove and highlight this for a very long time now.
As machines and machine learning perpetuate to take over the world, the only asset that remains with humans are skills that are inherently human: creativity and negotiation. It will take a long time for machines to replace these valuable skills. Displaying skills like these has no correlation with gender whatsoever and previous ideas of gender roles become obsolete which were based on physical differences only.
It is safe to argue that after havong received similar education - no gender is more qualified than the other for tasks in a modern setting. Some tasks which still require physical strength are undeniably suited to a particular gender more than the other in most cases. But, as these tasks dwindle in number in the next decade as the world moves towards technological progress, this gender gap is bound to close.
Today, we have seen women take up leadership roles in all verticals of professional life: politics, engineering, arts, medicine, etc. This strengthens my argument that given the same opportunities, women unquestionably hold the ability to come out better than their male counterparts in various tasks. It is important that the world, especially developing countries, tap into this resource that is inside the women of their population if they wish to achieve the economic growth they dream of elusively. An equal opportunity and level playing field that does not overburden women with household responsibilities can play a key role is realising the vistas of unending economic prosperity and development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 34, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to perpetuate'
Suggestion: to perpetuate
.... As machines and machine learning perpetuate to take over the world, the only asset ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...safe to argue that after havong received similar education - no gender is more qu...
^^
Line 17, column 633, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ld responsibilities can play a key role is realising the vistas of unending economic prosper...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, still, then, kind of, in most cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2414.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 473.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10359408034 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84447651823 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562367864693 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 761.4 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7539080631 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.952380952 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5238095238 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163826199099 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404795097658 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405516178627 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816091804751 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553179540863 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.