Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The prompt states that students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively. I mostly agree with the statement. My position is based on two reasons.
Firstly, questions can help the teacher to teach a subject comprehensively. In most cases, teachers do not cover the whole topics of a subject. Student's question will help the teacher to illustrate the missing part of the topics. For example, a chemistry teacher is teaching about the atomic model by different scientists. After Rutherford's atomic model the teacher has started to teach Bohr's atomic model, which is the updated version of Rutherford's model. Teacher may not include the limitations of Rutherford's atomic model. If any student ask the students that why it is needed to improve the Rutherford's atomic model, then teacher will tell the students about the limitations of atomic model of Rutherford. The example shows us that teacher may sometime unintentionally leave an important topic, and by the student's question teacher will able to teach about the uncoverd topic, which will give the completeness of the lecture of a teacher.
Secondly, in most of the cases student's question determine whether they understand the lesson or not. A student can make a good question when he or she stay attentive in the classroom. A student will only questions teacher when he or she understand some part of the lesson. If any student does not question about the topic then either they have not understand at all or the topic is so easy that it has not required to teach. For example, in a class a teacher delivers a lecture on theory of Relativity. After the lecture, no student ask any question, it is so unlikely that every student will understant the theory by single lecture of a teacher. In this case, the teacher should understand that he or she is not success to elucidate the topic. Therefore, question often determine whether the students understant the topic or not.
However, in some case some unrelated questions of student hampers the teaching procedure of a teacher. Sometimes, students ask questions which are really not relevant to the topics.In that case, those questions have no positive effects on learning.
In conclusion, it is now clear that to ask question is an integral part of the teaching process, but the questions must be relevant one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'stays'.
Suggestion: stays
...can make a good question when he or she stay attentive in the classroom. A student w...
^^^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'understands'.
Suggestion: understands
...l only questions teacher when he or she understand some part of the lesson. If any student...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'understood'.
Suggestion: understood
...out the topic then either they have not understand at all or the topic is so easy that it ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...h are really not relevant to the topics.In that case, those questions have no posi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02295918367 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76497545843 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438775510204 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 600.3 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4109108744 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77272727273 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161296703432 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636059258933 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059006520435 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130433663685 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0882901559138 0.0667264976115 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.