Teachers salaries depend on the performance of the student
Teachers' salaries should grow as per their performance of a student. That not only help the school to maintain accountability but also teachers will always work hard, no matter how they are experienced in the teaching field. And a student will always get quality teaching experience which helps them to grow their personal academic score up to mark.
By applying this policy we can see a significant change in the performance of a student under that particular teacher. As teachers have to focus on their teaching skill no matter how they are powerfull in school. This policy also helps the school to achieve success in an overall way. A student should give feedback to the teacher as it helps teachers to cope up with improvement given by the student and ultimetly a student achieve good score. Let me give an example of my school where one teacher used to take feedback on monthly bases, by doing that we as class saw overall growth of 15 per cent in marks. So by taking feedback from a student-teacher can improve their salaries.
After applying this policy teacher have to teach every subject seriously. In reality, one teacher teaches many subject to one classroom, a combination of hard and simple. But they fail to make it interesting to indulge student in the easy subject. After implementing this policy teacher may focus on all subject so that it will increase the grades of a student. Let's look at this example from my school: In my school, my class teacher uses to teach us maths as well as history, but the problem with our class teacher is she was good at teaching maths but this is not the same case with history. AS teaching history may required imagination and good storyteller skills. So we ended with a good score in maths but mediocre marks in the history. Applying this rule will affect teachers consistency of teaching a different subject.
In conclusion, Though it's hard decision to link student performance with teachers salaries and teachers have to work hard but in long term, we will easily see a difference in students good marks, which actually makes teachers happy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... student under that particular teacher. As teachers have to focus on their teachin...
^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an overall way" with adverb for "overall"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...lso helps the school to achieve success in an overall way. A student should give feedback to the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...-teacher can improve their salaries. After applying this policy teacher have to te...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun subject seems to be countable; consider using: 'many subjects'.
Suggestion: many subjects
...iously. In reality, one teacher teaches many subject to one classroom, a combination of hard...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... will increase the grades of a student. Lets look at this example from my school: In...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, look, may, so, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80662983425 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62465976143 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475138121547 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5986709083 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6666666667 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94444444444 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326376211285 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12612979957 0.0831039109588 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127904881383 0.0758088955206 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248962040584 0.150359130593 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808683096997 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.