The purpose of a teacher is to improve help his or her pupil to grow and develop to their complete potential. Along ago people were disciplned and devoted to teaching, so the outcome was a strong and standardised education system. As time passes these days people are relatively less proffesional in there work so the result is poor academic result. Maybe this is the reason the author wants to pay teachers based on academic performance of their students. Even the argument is simple is an ambivalance thought. Although a tutors goal is to educate students, I would have to disagree with the idea of rewarding the teacher based on their students academics.
Increasing the salary of teachers whos student is a good idea. This keeps the them motivated to work hard, money is prime motivator for most of the people in the world these days. Some university have old people due to the fact that they don't demand more money but this ultimately leads to poor performs of students. Having a young and energetic lecturer attracts students towards subject rather than having an old professor how has lost interest in his subject due to repetitive lectures. So does that mean that authors idea of rewarding teachers based on students performers is an excellent thought.
Even though the idea of rewarding the teachers is aligned in the same goal of the teacher, in practicality there are too many factor that will come into existence. Not ever one in class in smart some students will be bright and some may not be clever. Intellectuality is one case the other will be that some people maybe be more determined and focused while others would not be so intrested. similar example happened in my friend circle, one of my friends was not at all interested in studying he was attending college because his parents insisted him to go to class. Another factor would be though there are students in class some of them would be more involved in other co curricular activities rather than just studying.
Like wise each teacher would have their individual and unique method of teaching and also every student would respond to different type of teaching. Another example is one my teacher was passionate in teaching she would bring pictures and draw diagrams to explain in to us while another teacher was an excellent narrator. so every one has there ups and downs.
The authors idea is very good but considering the various factor that we have mentioned above and as well as the numerous factors that we could not have mentioned it would be a mistake. To conclude I would have to disagree with the authors idea as there are too many negative consequence that hinder the purpose of a teacher.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 524, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tutors'' or 'tutor's'?
Suggestion: tutors'; tutor's
...e is an ambivalance thought. Although a tutors goal is to educate students, I would ha...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 35, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
...ics. Increasing the salary of teachers whos student is a good idea. This keeps the ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'them'?
Suggestion: the; them
...whos student is a good idea. This keeps the them motivated to work hard, money is prime ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 196, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...n the world these days. Some university have old people due to the fact that they do...
^^^^
Line 2, column 238, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ve old people due to the fact that they dont demand more money but this ultimately l...
^^^^
Line 4, column 122, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun factor seems to be countable; consider using: 'many factors'.
Suggestion: many factors
... teacher, in practicality there are too many factor that will come into existence. Not ever...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'factors'?
Suggestion: factors
...her, in practicality there are too many factor that will come into existence. Not ever...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xistence. Not ever one in class in smart some students will be bright and some ma...
^^
Line 4, column 394, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similar
...while others would not be so intrested. similar example happened in my friend circle, o...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 323, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...ther teacher was an excellent narrator. so every one has there ups and downs. T...
^^
Line 8, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ery one has there ups and downs. The authors idea is very good but considering the v...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 233, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...clude I would have to disagree with the authors idea as there are too many negative con...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2222.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 462.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80952380952 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56241588162 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495670995671 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 711.9 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8600158264 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.80952381 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2380952381 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144927309454 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051080845616 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479559144545 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848427051551 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459995032801 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.